Graphic Card Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 and AMD FirePro 3D V8800
Graphic Card Intense Tasks
1440 × 900
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
![Graphic Card Intense Tasks image](/image/static/components-small/GPU.png)
Graphic Card Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD FirePro 3D V8800
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1440 × 900 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 and AMD FirePro 3D V8800, the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 performance in the Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor. While the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 processing abilities is advisable.
![Gauge that shows 9% of bottleneck](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/gauge/bottleneck-gauge-8-percent.png)
With a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 8.5% graphics card bottleneck when performing Graphic Card Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 and AMD FirePro 3D V8800, under the context of Graphic Card Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 68.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
![Utilization chart of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 and AMD FirePro 3D V8800 in Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/bar/utilizations-purpose_3-graphic-card-intense-tasks_1440x900_0gx-intel-core2-extreme-q9300_078-amd-firepro-3d-v8800.png)
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD FirePro 3D V8800. In such cases, the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300. Therefore, the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
![Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 score and AMD FirePro 3D V8800 score in Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/heatmap/purpose-3-graphic-card-intense-tasks_resolution-1440x900_cpuScore-33370_gpuScore-25125.png)
By matching your Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 CPU Score with the AMD FirePro 3D V8800 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Pentium G2020T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 B59 Full details
- Intel Pentium G6960 Full details
- Intel Pentium G850 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 415e Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 565 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8750 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 700e Full details
- AMD A6-5400B Full details
- Intel Pentium G860 Full details
- Intel Pentium J3710 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4020Y Full details
- AMD Phenom 8600B Full details
- Intel Celeron J4025 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4300Y Full details
- AMD A4 PRO-7300B Full details
- Intel Core i3-2100T Full details
- Intel Core i3-530 Full details
- AMD A6-6400K Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 900e Full details
- Intel Core i5-4202Y Full details
- Intel Core i5-4302Y Full details
- Intel Celeron G1610 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2120T Full details
- AMD Phenom 9750B Full details
- Intel Pentium G870 Full details
- AMD A4-7300 Full details
- AMD A4-6320 Full details
- Intel Core i3-540 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 B73 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9500 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 710 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 720 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4200Y Full details
- Intel Celeron G1620 Full details
- Intel Celeron G1830 Full details
- Intel Celeron J4005 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 425 Full details
- AMD A6-6420K Full details
- Intel Celeron G1840T Full details
- Intel Core i5-4210Y Full details
- Intel Pentium G2030T Full details
- Intel Pentium G840 Full details
- Intel Pentium J2900 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8650 Full details
- AMD Opteron 1354 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5320 Full details
- AMD Opteron X3216 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5504 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5335 Full details
![Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 and AMD FirePro 3D V8800 in Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_3-graphic-card-intense-tasks_1440x900_0gx-intel-core2-extreme-q9300_078-amd-firepro-3d-v8800_processor.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 460 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7790 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 360 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6970 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6950 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8000 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K520 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5100M Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla C2070 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7170M Full details
- AMD FirePro W4300 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K280Q Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K2 Full details
- AMD FirePro V9800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 Full details
![Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 and AMD FirePro 3D V8800 in Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_3-graphic-card-intense-tasks_1440x900_0gx-intel-core2-extreme-q9300_078-amd-firepro-3d-v8800_graphic-card.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.