Graphic Card Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Graphic Card Intense Tasks
1440 × 900
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
Graphic Card Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1440 × 900 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 in the Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150, with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 26.1% bottleneck for Graphic Card Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150, under the context of Graphic Card Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.2%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 55.5%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce MX150 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce MX150. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Celeron 5205U Full details
- Intel Core i5-2467M Full details
- AMD A6-8500P Full details
- Intel Core i3-2350M Full details
- AMD A6-3410MX Full details
- Intel Core i3-2348M Full details
- AMD A6-9220 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4012Y Full details
- Intel Celeron 3855U Full details
- Intel Core i3-3227U Full details
- Intel Atom x7-Z8750 Full details
- AMD A6-3420M Full details
- AMD A4-5000 Full details
- AMD Phenom II N850 Full details
- Intel Core i5-460M Full details
- AMD Phenom II P940 Full details
- Intel Celeron 3865U Full details
- Intel Core i5-480M Full details
- Intel Atom x7-Z8700 Full details
- AMD Phenom II N870 Full details
- AMD A4-5050 Full details
- Intel Pentium 3550M Full details
- AMD A8-4555M Full details
- AMD A6-9225 Full details
- Intel Pentium 3560M Full details
- AMD A4-5100 Full details
- AMD A9-9400 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2370M Full details
- Intel Celeron 4205U Full details
- AMD PRO A6-9500B Full details
- AMD Phenom II P960 Full details
- Intel Pentium N3710 Full details
- Intel Pentium 2020M Full details
- Intel Pentium 3825U Full details
- Intel Celeron N4000C Full details
- AMD A8-3500M Full details
- AMD GX-415GA SOC Full details
- Intel Pentium 2030M Full details
- Intel Celeron N4000 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 Full details
- AMD A9-9420e Full details
- Intel Celeron 1005M Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8435 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 Full details
- Intel Celeron N3350 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8135 Full details
- AMD A6-9200 Full details
- Intel Celeron 3215U Full details
- AMD E2-6110 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2312M Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M275X Full details
- Intel Iris Plus 650 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6900M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M370 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX110 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 940MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 845M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M370X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8790M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930A Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M375 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Full details
- Intel Iris Plus 640 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 940M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 830A Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M265X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M500M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 840A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GPU Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M275 Full details
- AMD Radeon 610M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 840M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 920MX Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8850M Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8600 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6700M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 830M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8750M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M260X Full details
- AMD FirePro M6000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M40003 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.