Graphic Card Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
AMD A4-3310MX and NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Graphic Card Intense Tasks
5120 × 2160
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
Graphic Card Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD A4-3310MX
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
5120 × 2160 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the AMD A4-3310MX and NVIDIA GeForce MX250, the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD A4-3310MX performance in the Graphic Card Intense Tasks with 5120 × 2160 and 1 monitor. While the AMD A4-3310MX is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD A4-3310MX processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 5120 × 2160 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 6.6% graphics card bottleneck when performing Graphic Card Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD A4-3310MX and NVIDIA GeForce MX250, under the context of Graphic Card Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 5120 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 69.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your AMD A4-3310MX might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the NVIDIA GeForce MX250. In such cases, the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD A4-3310MX. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD A4-3310MX capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD A4-3310MX is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD A4-3310MX is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your AMD A4-3310MX CPU Score with the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Celeron N3010 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo L7700 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3740D Full details
- Intel Celeron N3000 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-64 Full details
- AMD Turion II Neo N40L Full details
- AMD Turion II Neo K625 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3745 Full details
- Intel Pentium U5600 Full details
- Intel Core i5-430UM Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5800 Full details
- Intel Pentium T3200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3740 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5550 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 Full details
- Intel Pentium 967 Full details
- Intel Core i3-330UM Full details
- Intel Celeron U3400 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-56 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U7300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-62 Full details
- AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5300 Full details
- Intel Pentium T2310 Full details
- AMD E1-6010 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-52 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5500 Full details
- AMD TurionX2 Mobile RM-70 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3735F Full details
- Intel Pentium T2330 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2830 Full details
- Intel Celeron T1600 Full details
- Intel Pentium U5400 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-70 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3735E Full details
- Intel Pentium T2370 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5250 Full details
- AMD Turion RM-70 Full details
- Intel Celeron 867 Full details
- Intel Pentium T2390 Full details
- Intel Celeron 857 Full details
- AMD E1-6015 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U9600 Full details
- Intel Celeron U3600 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5450 Full details
- Intel Celeron 847E Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5670 Full details
- Intel Pentium 2129Y Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon R9 M295X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M395X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M395 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX550 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX450 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8970M Full details
- AMD Radeon 740M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M390X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD8970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M470X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M380 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M620 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX350 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX330 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M290X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 945M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M520 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.