Processor Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Core2 Solo U3500 and NVIDIA GeForce 920A
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Processor Intense Tasks
1680 × 1050
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
Processor Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce 920A
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1680 × 1050 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core2 Solo U3500 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce 920A in the Processor Intense Tasks with 1680 × 1050 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce 920A is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core2 Solo U3500 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce 920A capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core2 Solo U3500 and NVIDIA GeForce 920A, with a screen resolution of 1680 × 1050 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 10.4% bottleneck for Processor Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core2 Solo U3500 and NVIDIA GeForce 920A, under the context of Processor Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 1680 × 1050 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 67.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce 920A might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core2 Solo U3500 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce 920A at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core2 Solo U3500 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce 920A remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core2 Solo U3500 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce 920A. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core2 Solo U3500 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce 920A GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-75 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T7250 Full details
- AMD A4-3300M Full details
- Intel Pentium T4200 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T6400 Full details
- AMD E2-3000 Full details
- Intel Celeron B815 Full details
- AMD Athlon II P360 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Ultra Mobile ZM-82 Full details
- AMD A4-3305M Full details
- Intel Atom Z3770 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T7200 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Ultra Mobile ZM-87 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T6500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II M320 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-76 Full details
- Intel Core i3-380UM Full details
- Intel Celeron N3010 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo L7700 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3740D Full details
- Intel Celeron N3000 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-64 Full details
- AMD Turion II Neo N40L Full details
- AMD Turion II Neo K625 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3745 Full details
- Intel Pentium U5600 Full details
- Intel Core i5-430UM Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5800 Full details
- Intel Pentium T3200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3740 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5550 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-60 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 Full details
- Intel Pentium 967 Full details
- AMD GX-212JC SOC Full details
- Intel Pentium 987 Full details
- AMD Turion RM-72 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-62 Full details
- AMD E2-7015 Full details
- Intel Celeron B800 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5900 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-72 Full details
- Intel Pentium T3400 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-74 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo L7500 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60 Full details
- AMD Turion RM-75 Full details
- Intel Celeron N3060 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5600 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7730M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8730M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 730A Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 825M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6800M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M340 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4870 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 920M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6650M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7570M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6610M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M360 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 720A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7650M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7670M Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M330 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7550M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 910M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 810A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7610M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8500M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 820M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 820A Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M335 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 615 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M265 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M255 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5570 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M Full details
- AMD Radeon 6600M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8670M Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M260 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.