Processor Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Processor Intense Tasks
3440 × 1440
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
Processor Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
3440 × 1440 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 in the Processor Intense Tasks with 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250, with a screen resolution of 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 19.2% bottleneck for Processor Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250, under the context of Processor Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 60.7%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce MX250 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX250 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce MX250. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Pentium Silver N5000 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4258U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4288U Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100U Full details
- Intel Core i7-3687U Full details
- Intel Core i5-7Y54 Full details
- AMD A12-9720P Full details
- Intel Core i5-3610ME Full details
- Intel Core i7-3537U Full details
- Intel Core m5-6Y57 Full details
- AMD A10-9600P Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8730B Full details
- Intel Core i5-2540M Full details
- Intel Pentium 6405U Full details
- Intel Atom T5700 Full details
- Intel Core i7-3667U Full details
- Intel Core i7-4650U Full details
- Intel Core i7-2620M Full details
- Intel Celeron N4100 Full details
- AMD A12-9700P Full details
- AMD 3020e Full details
- Intel Celeron N4120 Full details
- Intel Core i5-5250U Full details
- Intel Core i7-2640M Full details
- Intel Core i5-3210M Full details
- Intel Core i7-8500Y Full details
- Intel Core i7-4500U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4300U Full details
- AMD PRO A12-8830B Full details
- Intel Core i5-5200U Full details
- Intel Core i3-4100M Full details
- Intel Core i5-4310U Full details
- AMD PRO A10-9700B Full details
- AMD FX-9800P Full details
- Intel Core i5-3230M Full details
- AMD A10-9620P Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver N5030 Full details
- Intel Core i3-7020U Full details
- AMD PRO A12-8800B Full details
- Intel Core i5-5350U Full details
- Intel Core m3-7Y30 Full details
- Intel Core i5-7Y57 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4510U Full details
- Intel Core i3-5157U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4210U Full details
- Intel Core i5-2450M Full details
- Intel Core i7-640M Full details
- AMD A10-7400P Full details
- Intel Core i5-2435M Full details
- Intel Core i5-3337U Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 945M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M520 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M375X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M Full details
- AMD Firepro W5170M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX230 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M275X Full details
- Intel Iris Plus 650 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6900M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M370 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX110 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 940MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 845M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M370X Full details
- Intel Iris Plus 640 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930MX Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M375 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8790M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GPU Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 840A Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M500M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M265X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 830A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 940M Full details
- AMD FirePro M6000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M40003 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.