Processor Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron J3160 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Processor Intense Tasks
3840 × 1600
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
![Processor Intense Tasks image](/image/static/components-small/CPU.png)
Processor Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron J3160
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
3840 × 1600 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Celeron J3160 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M in the Processor Intense Tasks with 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Celeron J3160 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
![Gauge that shows 22% of bottleneck](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/gauge/bottleneck-gauge-22-percent.png)
In a configuration featuring the Intel Celeron J3160 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M, with a screen resolution of 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 22.3% bottleneck for Processor Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron J3160 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M, under the context of Processor Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 58.4%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
![Utilization chart of Intel Celeron J3160 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M in Processor Intense Tasks with 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/bar/utilizations-purpose_2-processor-intense-tasks_3840x1600_0II-intel-celeron-j3160_0J8-nvidia-quadro-k5100m.png)
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA Quadro K5100M might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Celeron J3160 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Celeron J3160 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Celeron J3160 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
![Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing Intel Celeron J3160 score and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M score in Processor Intense Tasks with 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/heatmap/purpose-2-processor-intense-tasks_resolution-3840x1600_cpuScore-30079_gpuScore-28267.png)
By correlating your Intel Celeron J3160 CPU Score and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i3-4130 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 860K Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver J5040 Full details
- AMD A10-7860K Full details
- Intel Core i3-4360T Full details
- AMD A8-9600 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5500T Full details
- AMD FX-4350 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Full details
- Intel Core i7-880 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 840 Full details
- AMD PRO A8-9600 Full details
- AMD FX-4150 Full details
- Intel Core i7-960 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4370T Full details
- AMD A10 PRO-7800B Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1065T Full details
- Intel Core i3-4150 Full details
- Intel Core i5-2500S Full details
- AMD A10-7850K Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 870K Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1075T Full details
- Intel Core i5-2300 Full details
- Intel Core i7-965 Full details
- AMD A8-7500 Full details
- AMD A10-7870K Full details
- AMD A10-8850 Full details
- Intel Celeron J4105 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4150T Full details
- AMD FX-770K Full details
- Intel Core i5-2500T Full details
- Intel Core i7-940 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 760K Full details
- AMD A8 PRO-7600B Full details
- Intel Celeron J4125 Full details
- AMD A10-5800K Full details
- Intel Core i7-930 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3470 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3570 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3480 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5570 Full details
- Intel Xeon W5590 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3565 Full details
- Intel Xeon W5580 Full details
- AMD Opteron X3421 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5492 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5470 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3520 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3460 Full details
![Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Celeron J3160 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M in Processor Intense Tasks with 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_2-processor-intense-tasks_3840x1600_0II-intel-celeron-j3160_0J8-nvidia-quadro-k5100m_processor.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon RX 550X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6870 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 450 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 350 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5830 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M360 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 11 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 540 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7750 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 9 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega11 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6790 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Full details
- AMD Radeon E8860 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4890 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Full details
- AMD FirePro M5100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5010M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V7800 Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P400 Full details
- AMD FirePro W600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000D Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4100 Full details
![Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Celeron J3160 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M in Processor Intense Tasks with 3840 × 1600 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_2-processor-intense-tasks_3840x1600_0II-intel-celeron-j3160_0J8-nvidia-quadro-k5100m_graphic-card.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.