Processor Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Pentium 3805U and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Processor Intense Tasks
11520 × 2160
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
Processor Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Pentium 3805U
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
11520 × 2160 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Pentium 3805U may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX in the Processor Intense Tasks with 11520 × 2160 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Pentium 3805U might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Pentium 3805U and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX, with a screen resolution of 11520 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 21.9% bottleneck for Processor Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Pentium 3805U and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX, under the context of Processor Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 11520 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 58.7%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Pentium 3805U fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Pentium 3805U will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Pentium 3805U capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Pentium 3805U CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i5-3380M Full details
- AMD A10-9630P Full details
- Intel Core i5-4308U Full details
- AMD Athlon Silver 3050e Full details
- AMD A12-9730P Full details
- Intel Core i5-4300M Full details
- Intel Core i7-3540M Full details
- AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Full details
- Intel Core i5-6200U Full details
- Intel Core i7-5650U Full details
- Intel Core i7-4558U Full details
- Intel Core i3-7130U Full details
- Intel Core i7-5600U Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100H Full details
- Intel Core i5-4210H Full details
- Intel Core i5-5287U Full details
- Intel Core i7-5557U Full details
- Intel Core i7-4578U Full details
- Intel Core i5-6360U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4310M Full details
- Intel Core i5-6198DU Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver N5000 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4258U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4288U Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100U Full details
- Intel Core i7-3687U Full details
- Intel Core i5-7Y54 Full details
- AMD A12-9720P Full details
- Intel Core i5-3610ME Full details
- Intel Core i5-3320M Full details
- AMD PRO A12-9800B Full details
- Intel Core i5-3340M Full details
- Intel Core i7-4600U Full details
- AMD 3015e Full details
- Intel Core i3-7100U Full details
- Intel Core m3-7Y32 Full details
- Intel Core i5-5300U Full details
- AMD FX-7600P Full details
- Intel Core i3-6157U Full details
- Intel Core i5-8210Y Full details
- Intel Core i7-5500U Full details
- AMD RX-427BB Full details
- Intel Core i5-5257U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4200M Full details
- Intel Core i5-4278U Full details
- AMD FX-8800P Full details
- Intel Core i7-5550U Full details
- Intel Core i5-3360M Full details
- Intel Core m3-8100Y Full details
- Intel Core i7-3520M Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon 740M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M390X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD8970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M470X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M380 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M620 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX350 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX330 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX250 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M290X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 945M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M520 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX230 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Full details
- AMD Firepro W5170M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M375X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6900M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8870M Full details
- AMD FirePro M6000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Mobility Pro Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.