Processor Intense Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Atom E3815 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Processor Intense Tasks
1280 × 800
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
Processor Intense Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Atom E3815
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1280 × 800 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Atom E3815 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 in the Processor Intense Tasks with 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Atom E3815 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Atom E3815 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280, with a screen resolution of 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 41.5% bottleneck for Processor Intense Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Atom E3815 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280, under the context of Processor Intense Tasks with a screen resolution of 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 81.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 44%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Atom E3815 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Atom E3815 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Atom E3815 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Atom E3815 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD A6-7400K Full details
- Intel Pentium G3240T Full details
- Intel Celeron G1820T Full details
- AMD PRO A4-8350B Full details
- Intel Pentium G2020T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 B59 Full details
- Intel Pentium G6960 Full details
- Intel Pentium G850 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 415e Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 565 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8750 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 700e Full details
- AMD A6-5400B Full details
- Intel Pentium G860 Full details
- Intel Pentium J3710 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4020Y Full details
- AMD Phenom 8600B Full details
- Intel Celeron J4025 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4300Y Full details
- AMD A4 PRO-7300B Full details
- Intel Core i3-2100T Full details
- Intel Core i3-530 Full details
- AMD A6-6400K Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 900e Full details
- Intel Core i5-4202Y Full details
- Intel Core i5-4302Y Full details
- Intel Celeron G1610 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2120T Full details
- AMD Phenom 9750B Full details
- Intel Pentium G870 Full details
- AMD A4-7300 Full details
- AMD A4-6320 Full details
- Intel Core i3-540 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 B73 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9500 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 710 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 720 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4200Y Full details
- Intel Celeron G1620 Full details
- Intel Celeron G1830 Full details
- Intel Celeron J4005 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 425 Full details
- AMD A6-6420K Full details
- Intel Celeron G1840T Full details
- Intel Core i5-4210Y Full details
- AMD Opteron 1354 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5320 Full details
- AMD Opteron X3216 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5504 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5335 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7650A Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 3020e Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8830B Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8800B Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 M255DX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7570 Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A10-9600P Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 2900 PRO Full details
- Intel HD 4600 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M315 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 710A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7660G Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5570 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M420 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8690A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7660D Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 2 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Athlon Silver 3050e Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 330 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8650G Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8670D Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A8-8600B Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A10-8700B Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 A10-8700P Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 240 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 3870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6570 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 1000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V3800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 600 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K180Q Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V7750 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V5700 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.