General Tasks bottleneck calculator
Intel Core m3-7Y32 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design)
General Tasks
1600 × 900
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
![General Tasks image](/image/static/components-small/PC-Set-2.png)
General Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core m3-7Y32
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design)
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1600 × 900 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core m3-7Y32 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) in the General Tasks with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core m3-7Y32 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
![Gauge that shows 31% of bottleneck](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/gauge/bottleneck-gauge-31-percent.png)
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core m3-7Y32 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design), with a screen resolution of 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 30.8% bottleneck for General Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core m3-7Y32 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design), under the context of General Tasks with a screen resolution of 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.2%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 52.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
![Utilization chart of Intel Core m3-7Y32 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) in General Tasks with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/bar/utilizations-purpose_1-general-tasks_1600x900_0Ne-intel-core-m3-7y32_14c-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1650-max-q-design.png)
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core m3-7Y32 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core m3-7Y32 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core m3-7Y32 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design). Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
![Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing Intel Core m3-7Y32 score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) score in General Tasks with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/heatmap/purpose-1-general-tasks_resolution-1600x900_cpuScore-36439_gpuScore-39966.png)
By correlating your Intel Core m3-7Y32 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5425U Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2186M Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500H Full details
- Intel Core i7-11370H Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2276M Full details
- Intel Core i7-10850H Full details
- Intel Core i7-11375H Full details
- Intel Core i7-10750H Full details
- Intel Core i9-8950HK Full details
- Intel Core i7-9750HF Full details
- Intel Core i7-1195G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-9750H Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2176M Full details
- Intel Core i5-11300H Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 4500U Full details
- Intel Core i3-1215U Full details
- Intel Core i5-11320H Full details
- Intel Core i7-9850H Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5400U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 7330U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U Full details
- Intel Core i5-1230U Full details
- Intel Core i5-10500H Full details
- Intel Core i7-1165G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-8750H Full details
- Intel Core i3-1125G4 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300U Full details
- Intel Core i5-1135G7 Full details
- Intel Core i5-1145G7 Full details
- Intel Core i5-9500TE Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U Full details
- Intel Core i7-11390H Full details
- Intel Core i5-1155G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-8850H Full details
- Intel Core i7-1185G7 Full details
- Intel Core i5-8500B Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Full details
- Intel Core i3-1305U Full details
- Intel Core i5-1038NG7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-1160G7 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Full details
- Intel U300 Full details
- Intel Core i7-1068NG7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-10710U Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400H Full details
- Intel Core i7-10810U Full details
- Intel Core i7-1180G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-1065G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-8559U Full details
![Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Core m3-7Y32 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) in General Tasks with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_1-general-tasks_1600x900_0Ne-intel-core-m3-7y32_14c-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1650-max-q-design_processor.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce MX550 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX450 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8970M Full details
- AMD Radeon 740M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M390X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD8970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M470X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M380 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M620 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX350 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX330 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX250 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M290X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 945M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M520 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Full details
![Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Core m3-7Y32 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) in General Tasks with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_1-general-tasks_1600x900_0Ne-intel-core-m3-7y32_14c-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1650-max-q-design_graphic-card.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.