General Tasks bottleneck calculator
AMD A9-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design)
General Tasks
10240 × 4320
1 monitor
1. Select purpose
Currently selected:
![General Tasks image](/image/static/components-small/PC-Set-2.png)
General Tasks
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD A9-9400
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design)
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
10240 × 4320 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD A9-9400 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) in the General Tasks with 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD A9-9400 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
![Gauge that shows 8% of bottleneck](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/gauge/bottleneck-gauge-8-percent.png)
In a configuration featuring the AMD A9-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design), with a screen resolution of 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 7.7% bottleneck for General Tasks.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD A9-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design), under the context of General Tasks with a screen resolution of 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 69.5%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
![Utilization chart of AMD A9-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) in General Tasks with 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/bar/utilizations-purpose_1-general-tasks_10240x4320_0KN-amd-a9-9400_11g-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-max-q-design.png)
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD A9-9400 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD A9-9400 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD A9-9400 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design). Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
![Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing AMD A9-9400 score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) score in General Tasks with 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/heatmap/purpose-1-general-tasks_resolution-10240x4320_cpuScore-30543_gpuScore-37316.png)
By correlating your AMD A9-9400 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i7-3537U Full details
- Intel Core m5-6Y57 Full details
- AMD A10-9600P Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8730B Full details
- Intel Core i5-2540M Full details
- Intel Pentium 6405U Full details
- Intel Atom T5700 Full details
- Intel Core i7-3667U Full details
- Intel Core i7-4650U Full details
- Intel Core i7-2620M Full details
- Intel Celeron N4100 Full details
- AMD A12-9700P Full details
- AMD 3020e Full details
- Intel Celeron N4120 Full details
- Intel Core i5-5250U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4210U Full details
- Intel Core i5-2450M Full details
- Intel Core i7-640M Full details
- AMD A10-7400P Full details
- Intel Core i5-2435M Full details
- Intel Core i5-3337U Full details
- Intel Celeron 6305 Full details
- Intel Atom x7-E3950 Full details
- Intel Pentium 4405U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4250U Full details
- AMD A8-7200P Full details
- Intel Core m3-6Y30 Full details
- Intel Pentium N4200 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4200U Full details
- Intel Core i7-940XM Full details
- Intel Core i3-5020U Full details
- AMD PRO A8-8600B Full details
- Intel Core i3-5010U Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8700B Full details
- Intel Core i5-8200Y Full details
- Intel Pentium 4415U Full details
- Intel Core i5-2520M Full details
- AMD A10-8700P Full details
- AMD A8-8600P Full details
- Intel Core i5-3427U Full details
- Intel Pentium 5405U Full details
- Intel Core m5-6Y54 Full details
- Intel Pentium 4417U Full details
- Intel Core i7-4550U Full details
- Intel Core i3-6006U Full details
- AMD PRO A8-9600B Full details
- Intel Core i5-4260U Full details
- Intel Core m7-6Y75 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3437U Full details
- Intel Core i7-3517UE Full details
![Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD A9-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) in General Tasks with 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_1-general-tasks_10240x4320_0KN-amd-a9-9400_11g-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-max-q-design_processor.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M4000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon 760M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5300M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5500M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M295X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M395X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M395 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX550 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX450 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8970M Full details
- AMD Radeon 740M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M390X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD8970M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M470X Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX350 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M620 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M380 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M Full details
![Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD A9-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) in General Tasks with 10240 × 4320 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-purpose_1-general-tasks_10240x4320_0KN-amd-a9-9400_11g-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-max-q-design_graphic-card.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.