The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing III bottleneck calculator
AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Radeon 535DX
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing III
1024 × 768
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing III
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Sempron 3300+
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon 535DX
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1024 × 768 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Radeon 535DX in the The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing III with 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Radeon 535DX, under the context of The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing III with a screen resolution of 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.5%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 77.5%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Radeon 535DX. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Radeon 535DX will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing III. The presence of both the AMD Sempron 3300+ and AMD Radeon 535DX in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your AMD Sempron 3300+ CPU Score against the AMD Radeon 535DX GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 75.73%
- Processor maximum
- 91.37%
- Graphic card average
- 82.88%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.24%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 72.01%
- Graphic card maximum
- 87.55%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 18.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 60.58%
- Processor maximum
- 73.1%
- Graphic card average
- 82.88%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Celeron E1200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2140 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 940 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 830 Full details
- Intel Celeron G465 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 Full details
- Intel Celeron G470 Full details
- AMD Sempron 2650 Full details
- Intel Celeron J1800 Full details
- Intel Celeron 1019Y Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 Full details
- AMD E2-1800 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 915 Full details
- Intel Atom D2700 Full details
- Intel Celeron G460 Full details
- Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955 Full details
- AMD Sempron 140 Full details
- AMD Sempron 145 Full details
- Intel Atom 330 Full details
- AMD Sempron 3600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron 440 Full details
- Intel Celeron D 360 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 805 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3300+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Full details
- Intel Atom E3825 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3700+ Full details
- Intel Atom D525 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 Full details
- Intel Atom D510 Full details
- Intel Atom D2550 Full details
- AMD Athlon 1640B Full details
- AMD Athlon LE-1600 Full details
- Intel Celeron 450 Full details
- AMD Athlon LE-1660 Full details
- AMD Sempron LE-1300 Full details
- AMD Athlon LE-1620 Full details
- Intel Celeron G440 Full details
- AMD Athlon LE-1640 Full details
- AMD Sempron LE-1250 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Full details
- AMD Opteron 165 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
- Intel Xeon 5110 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon Athlon Gold 3150U Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M270 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8750B Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4810 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M365X Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7700K Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7600 Full details
- AMD Radeon R8 M445DX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M435 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 Extreme Edition Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M260DX Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7680 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 PRO A8-9600B Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 2900 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8 PRO-7600B Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A10-9620P Radeon R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C Full details
- AMD Radeon Athlon Silver 3050U Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 PRO A10-8730B Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A10-9600P Radeon R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A6-7480 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-9800B Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6550A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 3870 X2 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7800 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A8-8650B Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A12-9700P Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A10-9620P Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A12-9720P Radeon Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-9800P Radeon Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7650K Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 PRO A10-8730B R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7570 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 2000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 Full details
- AMD FirePro M7740 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K610M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K420 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.