Layers of Fear bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron G1620 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Layers of Fear
800 × 600
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Layers of Fear
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron G1620
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
800 × 600 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the Intel Celeron G1620 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the Intel Celeron G1620 performance in the Layers of Fear with 800 × 600 and 1 monitor. While the Intel Celeron G1620 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the Intel Celeron G1620 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 800 × 600 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 3.5% graphics card bottleneck when performing Layers of Fear.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron G1620 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, under the context of Layers of Fear with a screen resolution of 800 × 600 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 72.5%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your Intel Celeron G1620 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8. In such cases, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the Intel Celeron G1620. Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the Intel Celeron G1620 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the Intel Celeron G1620 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the Intel Celeron G1620 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Score with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 8.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 68.97%
- Processor maximum
- 83.16%
- Graphic card average
- 82.94%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.92%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 79.77%
- Graphic card maximum
- 96.2%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 26.5%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 55.18%
- Processor maximum
- 66.53%
- Graphic card average
- 82.94%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Pentium G2020T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 B59 Full details
- Intel Pentium G6960 Full details
- Intel Pentium G850 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 415e Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 565 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8750 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 700e Full details
- AMD A6-5400B Full details
- Intel Pentium G860 Full details
- Intel Pentium J3710 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4020Y Full details
- AMD Phenom 8600B Full details
- Intel Pentium G840 Full details
- Intel Pentium J2900 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8650 Full details
- Intel Celeron G550 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 265 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 511 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3160 Full details
- AMD A4-4020 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B28 Full details
- AMD A6-5400K Full details
- AMD Phenom 9100e Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 270 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 555 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 340 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 400e Full details
- Intel Celeron G1610T Full details
- Intel Pentium G630 Full details
- AMD A4-6300B Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 405e Full details
- Intel Pentium G640 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 280 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4010Y Full details
- AMD A4-5300 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 521 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8600 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 560 Full details
- Intel Celeron G555 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5150 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 570 Full details
- Intel Pentium G645 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9150e Full details
- AMD A6-3500 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 740 Full details
- AMD Opteron 1354 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3210 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3120 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7770 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 450 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 350 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5830 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M360 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 11 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 540 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 9 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega11 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6790 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Full details
- AMD Radeon E8860 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4890 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-9830P Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 255 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Full details
- AMD FirePro M5100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5010M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V7800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000D Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P400 Full details
- AMD FirePro W600 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for Intel Celeron G1620
Celeron G1620
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620 1 new from 49.00 $. 2 used from 93.00 $. Last updated 26 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 49.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.