Layers of Fear bottleneck calculator
Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Radeon HD 7950
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Layers of Fear
5120 × 4096
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Layers of Fear
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core i5-9400
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon HD 7950
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
5120 × 4096 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Radeon HD 7950, the AMD Radeon HD 7950 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the Intel Core i5-9400 performance in the Layers of Fear with 5120 × 4096 and 1 monitor. While the Intel Core i5-9400 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD Radeon HD 7950 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the Intel Core i5-9400 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 5120 × 4096 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 39.2% graphics card bottleneck when performing Layers of Fear.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core i5-9400 and AMD Radeon HD 7950, under the context of Layers of Fear with a screen resolution of 5120 × 4096 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 45.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your Intel Core i5-9400 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD Radeon HD 7950. In such cases, the AMD Radeon HD 7950 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the Intel Core i5-9400. Therefore, the AMD Radeon HD 7950 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the Intel Core i5-9400 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD Radeon HD 7950 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD Radeon HD 7950 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the Intel Core i5-9400 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the Intel Core i5-9400 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your Intel Core i5-9400 CPU Score with the AMD Radeon HD 7950 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 41.9%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 43.72%
- Processor maximum
- 52.58%
- Graphic card average
- 83.14%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 27.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 54.64%
- Processor maximum
- 65.73%
- Graphic card average
- 83.14%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 53.5%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 34.97%
- Processor maximum
- 42.07%
- Graphic card average
- 83.14%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Celeron J4105 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4150T Full details
- AMD FX-770K Full details
- Intel Core i5-2500T Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 559 Full details
- AMD A8-5500 Full details
- AMD FX-4100 Full details
- AMD A8-5500B Full details
- Intel Core i5-680 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 750 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 740 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 965 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B60 Full details
- Intel Core i5-760 Full details
- Intel Celeron G5900 Full details
- AMD FX-4130 Full details
- Intel Celeron J4115 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B65 Full details
- Intel Pentium G4520 Full details
- AMD A10-5700 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 970 Full details
- Intel Pentium G4500 Full details
- Intel Celeron G5905 Full details
- AMD A8-6500 Full details
- Intel Core i7-920 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 980 Full details
- Intel Celeron G5925 Full details
- AMD A8-5600K Full details
- AMD A8-6500B Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8750B Full details
- Intel Core i3-4130T Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 Full details
- Intel Celeron G3950 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 Full details
- Intel Pentium G4400T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 960T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 940 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5492 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5470 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2407 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5607 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5530 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5482 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3440 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5540 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2609 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3450 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5365 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon RX 7700S Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6600 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro W5700 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA TITAN X Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A2000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Full details
- Intel Arc A770 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Full details
- Intel Arc A750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon PRO W6600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro VII Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla P40 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4200 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for AMD Radeon HD 7950
21196-00-20G
FX-795A-TNBC
100352FLEX-2
H795F3G2M
100352VXSR
FX-795A-TDJC
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Gaming graphics card with Twin Frozr VI cooling system 11 new from 214.00 $. 2 used from 89.00 $. Last updated 58 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 214.48 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
Yes | 899.99 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
9 new from 133.00 $. 10 used from 74.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 133.93 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.