Layers of Fear bottleneck calculator
AMD FX-8320E and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Layers of Fear
5120 × 2160
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Layers of Fear
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD FX-8320E
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
5120 × 2160 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD FX-8320E may serve as a bottleneck for the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT in the Layers of Fear with 5120 × 2160 and 1 monitor. Although the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD FX-8320E might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the AMD FX-8320E and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, with a screen resolution of 5120 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 0.3% bottleneck for Layers of Fear.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD FX-8320E and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, under the context of Layers of Fear with a screen resolution of 5120 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 75.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD FX-8320E fails to handle and transmit data to the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD FX-8320E will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD FX-8320E capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your AMD FX-8320E CPU Score and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.21%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 81.15%
- Graphic card maximum
- 97.53%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 13.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.21%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 64.92%
- Graphic card maximum
- 78.03%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 9.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 68.19%
- Processor maximum
- 82.02%
- Graphic card average
- 83.14%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-6700 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4790K Full details
- Intel Core i3-9350KF Full details
- Intel Core i7-5775R Full details
- Intel Core i7-7700T Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-5775C Full details
- Intel Core i5-8500T Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Full details
- Intel Core i3-10105T Full details
- Intel Core i3-10300T Full details
- Intel Core i5-9500T Full details
- Intel Core i7-3930K Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Full details
- Intel Core i7-4790 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4770 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4770K Full details
- Intel Core i7-980 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 1300X Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Full details
- AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-4790S Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2470 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2665 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2224G Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1650 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2660 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2314 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2124 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3680 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon RX 590 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 390X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro W5500 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 390 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX590 GME Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 480 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5500 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 290 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 290X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 470 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Duo Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Full details
- Intel Arc A380 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 285 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6300 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M5000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Full details
- AMD FirePro W9100 Full details
- AMD Radeon PRO W6400 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5300 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W9000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FD832EWMHKBOX FX-8320E 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4000Mhz 95W 16MB FD8370EWHKBOX |
|
Yes | 90.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
1 new from 178.00 $. 1 used from 169.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 178.02 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.