Layers of Fear bottleneck calculator
AMD A6-7400K and AMD Radeon HD 6870
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Layers of Fear
3200 × 2400
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Layers of Fear
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD A6-7400K
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon HD 6870
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
3200 × 2400 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the AMD A6-7400K and AMD Radeon HD 6870, the AMD Radeon HD 6870 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD A6-7400K performance in the Layers of Fear with 3200 × 2400 and 1 monitor. While the AMD A6-7400K is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD Radeon HD 6870 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD A6-7400K processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 3200 × 2400 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 7.4% graphics card bottleneck when performing Layers of Fear.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD A6-7400K and AMD Radeon HD 6870, under the context of Layers of Fear with a screen resolution of 3200 × 2400 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 69.6%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your AMD A6-7400K might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD Radeon HD 6870. In such cases, the AMD Radeon HD 6870 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD A6-7400K. Therefore, the AMD Radeon HD 6870 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD A6-7400K capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD Radeon HD 6870 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD Radeon HD 6870 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD A6-7400K is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD A6-7400K is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your AMD A6-7400K CPU Score with the AMD Radeon HD 6870 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 15%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 63.72%
- Processor maximum
- 76.64%
- Graphic card average
- 83.15%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 79.65%
- Processor maximum
- 95.8%
- Graphic card average
- 83.15%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 32%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 50.98%
- Processor maximum
- 61.31%
- Graphic card average
- 83.15%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Pentium G840 Full details
- Intel Pentium J2900 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8650 Full details
- Intel Celeron G550 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 265 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 511 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3160 Full details
- AMD A4-4020 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B28 Full details
- AMD A6-5400K Full details
- AMD Phenom 9100e Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 270 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 555 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 340 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 400e Full details
- Intel Celeron G1610T Full details
- Intel Pentium G630 Full details
- AMD A4-6300B Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 405e Full details
- Intel Pentium G640 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 280 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4010Y Full details
- AMD A4-5300 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 521 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8600 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 560 Full details
- Intel Celeron G555 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5150 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 570 Full details
- Intel Pentium G645 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9150e Full details
- AMD A6-3500 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6500 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 245 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8200 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6850 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B24 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6600 Full details
- Intel Celeron G530 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7500 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 B53 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 250 Full details
- Intel Pentium G640T Full details
- AMD Sempron 3850 Full details
- AMD A4-4000 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3210 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3120 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3503 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon RX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7790 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 360 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6970 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5970 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K520 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5100M Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla C2070 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7170M Full details
- AMD FirePro W4300 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K280Q Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 6000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro V9800 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K2 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K620 Full details
- AMD FirePro V7900 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3100M Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for AMD Radeon HD 6870
100314SR
H687QNX1G2M
EAH6870/2DI2S/1GD5
100314-3L
GV-R687D5-1GD-B
AX6870 1GBD5-M2DH
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes | 124.04 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
New XFX Video Card HD-687A-ZNFC HD6870 1GB DDR5 256Bit DVI/HDMI/Mini DisplayPort x2 with Fan Retail |
|
Yes | 199.99 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for AMD A6-7400K
A6-7400K
A6-7400K
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD AD740KYBJABOX A6-7400K Dual-Core 3.5 GHz Socket FM2+ Desktop Processor Radeon R5 Series 1 new from 85.00 $. 4 used from 38.00 $. Last updated 57 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 85.23 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.