Layers of Fear bottleneck calculator
AMD Opteron 180 and AMD Radeon E8860
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Layers of Fear
2800 × 2100
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Layers of Fear
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Opteron 180
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon E8860
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
2800 × 2100 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD Opteron 180 may serve as a bottleneck for the AMD Radeon E8860 in the Layers of Fear with 2800 × 2100 and 1 monitor. Although the AMD Radeon E8860 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD Opteron 180 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the AMD Radeon E8860 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the AMD Opteron 180 and AMD Radeon E8860, with a screen resolution of 2800 × 2100 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 0.8% bottleneck for Layers of Fear.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Opteron 180 and AMD Radeon E8860, under the context of Layers of Fear with a screen resolution of 2800 × 2100 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.7%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 74.7%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your AMD Radeon E8860 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD Opteron 180 fails to handle and transmit data to the AMD Radeon E8860 at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD Opteron 180 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the AMD Radeon E8860 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD Opteron 180 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the AMD Radeon E8860. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your AMD Opteron 180 CPU Score and AMD Radeon E8860 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 78.78%
- Processor maximum
- 94.82%
- Graphic card average
- 83.08%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 7.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.5%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 69.6%
- Graphic card maximum
- 84.37%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 15.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 63.02%
- Processor maximum
- 75.86%
- Graphic card average
- 83.08%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD E2-3200 Full details
- Intel Pentium E5400 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 215 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8135 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7750 Full details
- Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6700 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7200 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 240e Full details
- Intel Core i3-3229Y Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6750 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7400 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6300 Full details
- Intel Pentium E5500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 240 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 220 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B22 Full details
- AMD A4-3420 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7850 Full details
- Intel Atom E3845 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 235e Full details
- AMD Phenom X3 8550 Full details
- AMD A4-3400 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8250e Full details
- Intel Pentium E5700 Full details
- Intel Pentium G630T Full details
- AMD Athlon 5200B Full details
- Intel Celeron E3200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 5050e Full details
- Intel Pentium E2220 Full details
- Intel Celeron E3400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5000B Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4600 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5000 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6550 Full details
- Intel Pentium G620T Full details
- Intel Pentium E5300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7550 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Full details
- Intel Xeon 5160 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3060 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3070 Full details
- Intel Xeon 5140 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3065 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5830 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M360 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 11 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 9 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega11 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6790 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 Full details
- AMD Radeon 540X Full details
- AMD Radeon 550X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 255 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-9830P Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4890 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4870 Full details
- AMD Radeon 540 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 6 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4870 X2 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon 630 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6770 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5010M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000D Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P400 Full details
- AMD FirePro W600 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5130M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2100M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000M Full details
- AMD FirePro V5900 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V5800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8700 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.