Riders of Icarus bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron 925 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Riders of Icarus
1024 × 768
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Riders of Icarus
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron 925
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1024 × 768 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the Intel Celeron 925 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M in the Riders of Icarus with 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron 925 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M, under the context of Riders of Icarus with a screen resolution of 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 76.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 82.7%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the Intel Celeron 925 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the Intel Celeron 925 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for Riders of Icarus. The presence of both the Intel Celeron 925 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your Intel Celeron 925 CPU Score against the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 29%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 53.01%
- Processor maximum
- 64.46%
- Graphic card average
- 82.24%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 11.2%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 66.26%
- Processor maximum
- 80.58%
- Graphic card average
- 82.24%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 43.2%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 42.41%
- Processor maximum
- 51.57%
- Graphic card average
- 82.24%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Core i3-330UM Full details
- Intel Celeron U3400 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-56 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U7300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-62 Full details
- AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5300 Full details
- Intel Pentium T2310 Full details
- AMD E1-6010 Full details
- AMD E-450 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U9300 Full details
- Intel Atom N2800 Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2600 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo L7100 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5200 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-50 Full details
- Intel Celeron SU2300 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-58 Full details
- AMD G-T56N Full details
- Intel Celeron 847 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2806 Full details
- AMD Athlon II Neo N36L Full details
- Intel Pentium SU4100 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2815 Full details
- AMD E2-2000 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3736F Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2700 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2820 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo SU9400 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2807 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Ultra Mobile ZM-80 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2808 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo L7300 Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2350 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U7500 Full details
- Intel Celeron 900 Full details
- AMD E1-1500 Full details
- AMD E1-2100 Full details
- AMD A4-1250 Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2500 Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2450 Full details
- AMD V140 Full details
- AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2810 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5270 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U7700 Full details
- AMD G-T48E Full details
- AMD Turion Neo X2 L625 Full details
- Intel Pentium T2130 Full details
- AMD E1-1200 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7730M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8730M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 730A Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 825M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M340 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4870 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 920M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6650M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7570M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6610M Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M360 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 720A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7650M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7670M Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M330 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7550M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 910M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 810A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7610M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8500M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 820M Full details
- AMD Radeon 6600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5570 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M255 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 615 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M265 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M335 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 820A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8670M Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5730 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M260 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.