Quantcast

Hatred bottleneck calculator

AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

1
Game
2
CPU
3
GPU
4
Resolution
Video game
Hatred
Resolution
3840 × 2160
Monitors
1 monitor
Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

1. Select game

Currently selected:

Hatred image
Hatred

4. Select resolution

Currently selected:
3840 × 2160 resolution
(1 monitor)

Calculation result

Bottleneck percentage

In a system configuration featuring the AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD EPYC 9654 performance in the Hatred with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor. While the AMD EPYC 9654 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD EPYC 9654 processing abilities is advisable.

Gauge that shows 4% of bottleneck

With a screen resolution of 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 3.5% graphics card bottleneck when performing Hatred.

Processor and graphic card utilizations

In a computing setup featuring the AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, under the context of Hatred with a screen resolution of 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 72.5%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.

It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.

Utilization chart of AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT inHatred with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

Playability

Playable
Frames per second
68.75 FPS
View the full FPS calculation

A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.

Heatmap of bottleneck

During gameplay scenarios, your AMD EPYC 9654 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. In such cases, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD EPYC 9654. Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD EPYC 9654 capabilities untapped.

In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT features.

One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD EPYC 9654 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD EPYC 9654 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.

To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.

Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing AMD EPYC 9654 score and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT score inHatred with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

By matching your AMD EPYC 9654 CPU Score with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.

General bottleneck calculations

The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.

General tasks bottleneck result

For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.

Bottleneck percentage
25.9%
Bottleneck reason
Graphic card
Playable
Frames per second
132.9 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
55.63%
Processor maximum
66.96%
Graphic card average
83.08%
Graphic card maximum
100%

CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result

When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.

Bottleneck percentage
7.4%
Bottleneck reason
Graphic card
Playable
Frames per second
166.12 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
69.54%
Processor maximum
83.7%
Graphic card average
83.08%
Graphic card maximum
100%

GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result

In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.

Bottleneck percentage
40.8%
Bottleneck reason
Graphic card
Playable
Frames per second
132.9 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
44.51%
Processor maximum
53.57%
Graphic card average
83.08%
Graphic card maximum
100%

Bottleneck solutions

Replace processor

If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.

Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT inHatred with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

Impact of Changing Screen Resolution

Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.

Read more

Replace graphic cards

When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.

Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD EPYC 9654 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT inHatred with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

Impact of Changing Screen Resolution

If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.

Read more

Offers for AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Merchant location:

Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.

Bottleneck calculator types

Select purpose bottleneck calculator

Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.

Select game bottleneck calculator