Enter the Gungeon bottleneck calculator
Intel Core i7-970 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Enter the Gungeon
1440 × 900
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Enter the Gungeon
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core i7-970
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1440 × 900 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core i7-970 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti in the Enter the Gungeon with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core i7-970 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core i7-970 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 4.8% bottleneck for Enter the Gungeon.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core i7-970 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, under the context of Enter the Gungeon with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 71.7%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core i7-970 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core i7-970 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core i7-970 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core i7-970 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 76.35%
- Processor maximum
- 91.78%
- Graphic card average
- 83.19%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 3.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.19%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 72.51%
- Graphic card maximum
- 87.16%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 18.8%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 61.08%
- Processor maximum
- 73.42%
- Graphic card average
- 83.19%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400F Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Full details
- Intel Core i5-10600T Full details
- Intel Core i7-6850K Full details
- Intel Core i5-10505 Full details
- Intel Core i5-9600K Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 4100 Full details
- Intel Core i5-9600KF Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G Full details
- Intel Core i7-9700T Full details
- Intel Core i7-6800K Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 4300G Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 Full details
- Intel Core i5-8600K Full details
- Intel Core i5-9600 Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400T Full details
- Intel Core i5-9500 Full details
- Intel Core i7-5820K Full details
- Intel Core i5-8600 Full details
- Intel Core i3-10320 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2126G Full details
- Intel Xeon W-2225 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2226G Full details
- Intel Xeon Silver 4208 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2689 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2174G Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2690 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2274G Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2687W Full details
- Intel Xeon W-2125 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon R9 270 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 370 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 460 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7790 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 360 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6970 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8950 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Adapter Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8000 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K520 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5100M Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla C2070 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7170M Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K280Q Full details
- AMD FirePro W4300 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K2 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GV-N66TOC-2GD
66NPH7DV6XXZ
GTX660 TI-DC2T-2GD5
N660TI TF 3GD5/OC
66NNH7DV6WXZ
66INH7DV6KXZ
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes | 99.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
|
Yes | 222.02 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
1 new from 325.00 $. 1 used from 245.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 325.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
1 new from 379.00 $. 1 used from 198.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 379.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
1 new from 379.00 $. 3 used from 198.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 379.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Core i7-970
Core i7-970
Core i7-970
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core i7 i7-970 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket B LGA-1366 1 new from 229.00 $. 1 used from 177.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 229.95 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.