AdVenture Capitalist bottleneck calculator
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
AdVenture Capitalist
6400 × 4096
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
AdVenture Capitalist
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
6400 × 4096 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD Athlon 64 3200+ may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 in the AdVenture Capitalist with 6400 × 4096 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and NVIDIA Quadro K2000, with a screen resolution of 6400 × 4096 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 2.9% bottleneck for AdVenture Capitalist.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and NVIDIA Quadro K2000, under the context of AdVenture Capitalist with a screen resolution of 6400 × 4096 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.6%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 73.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA Quadro K2000 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA Quadro K2000 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA Quadro K2000. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your AMD Athlon 64 3200+ CPU Score and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 75.74%
- Processor maximum
- 91.15%
- Graphic card average
- 83.1%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 4.2%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.1%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 72.06%
- Graphic card maximum
- 87.77%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 18.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 60.59%
- Processor maximum
- 72.92%
- Graphic card average
- 83.1%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron E1500 Full details
- Intel Celeron E1200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2140 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 940 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 830 Full details
- Intel Celeron G465 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 Full details
- Intel Celeron G470 Full details
- AMD Sempron 2650 Full details
- Intel Celeron J1800 Full details
- Intel Celeron 1019Y Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 250u Full details
- AMD Sempron 150 Full details
- AMD E2-1800 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 915 Full details
- Intel Atom D2700 Full details
- Intel Celeron G460 Full details
- Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955 Full details
- AMD Sempron 140 Full details
- AMD Sempron 145 Full details
- Intel Atom 330 Full details
- AMD Sempron 3600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron 440 Full details
- Intel Celeron D 360 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 805 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3300+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Full details
- Intel Atom E3825 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3700+ Full details
- Intel Atom D525 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 Full details
- Intel Atom D510 Full details
- Intel Atom D2550 Full details
- AMD Athlon 1640B Full details
- AMD Athlon LE-1600 Full details
- Intel Celeron 450 Full details
- AMD Opteron 165 Full details
- AMD Opteron 1212 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
- Intel Xeon 5110 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon HD 7750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 9 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega11 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6790 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Full details
- AMD Radeon E8860 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 Full details
- AMD Radeon 540X Full details
- AMD Radeon 550X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 255 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-9830P Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4890 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Full details
- AMD Radeon 630 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4870 X2 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 6 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4870 Full details
- AMD Radeon 540 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6770 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7730 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 Opteron X3421 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5750 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4850 X2 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000D Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P400 Full details
- AMD FirePro W600 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5130M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4100 Full details
- AMD FirePro V5900 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2100M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V5800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8700 Full details
- AMD FirePro V5800 Full details
- AMD Firepro W4190M Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA Quadro K2000
C2J93AT
C2J93AA
VCQK2000-PB
0B47392
C2J93AT
C2J93AA
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2GB GDDR5 Graphics card (PNY Part #: VCQK2000-PB) 4 new from 87.00 $. 2 used from 117.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 87.50 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
Yes | 149.99 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.