Titanfall bottleneck calculator
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design)
Titanfall
1920 × 1080
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Titanfall
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design)
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1920 × 1080 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) in the Titanfall with 1920 × 1080 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design), with a screen resolution of 1920 × 1080 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 2.7% bottleneck for Titanfall.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design), under the context of Titanfall with a screen resolution of 1920 × 1080 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.2%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 73.3%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700U capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design). Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your AMD Ryzen 7 3700U CPU Score and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Max-Q Design) GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i3-1315U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5425U Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2186M Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 5500H Full details
- Intel Core i7-11370H Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2276M Full details
- Intel Core i7-10850H Full details
- Intel Core i7-11375H Full details
- Intel Core i7-10750H Full details
- Intel Core i7-8700B Full details
- Intel Core i7-1250U Full details
- Intel Core i9-8950HK Full details
- Intel Core i7-9750HF Full details
- Intel Core i7-1195G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-9750H Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2176M Full details
- Intel Core i5-11300H Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 4500U Full details
- Intel Core i3-1215U Full details
- Intel Core i5-11320H Full details
- Intel Core i7-9850H Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5400U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 7330U Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U Full details
- Intel Core i5-1230U Full details
- Intel Core i5-10500H Full details
- Intel Core i7-1165G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-8750H Full details
- Intel Core i3-1125G4 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300U Full details
- Intel Core i5-1135G7 Full details
- Intel Core i5-1145G7 Full details
- Intel Core i5-9500TE Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U Full details
- Intel Core i7-11390H Full details
- Intel Core i5-1155G7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-8850H Full details
- Intel Core i7-1185G7 Full details
- Intel Core i5-8500B Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Full details
- Intel Core i3-1305U Full details
- Intel Core i5-1038NG7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-1160G7 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Full details
- Intel U300 Full details
- Intel Core i7-1068NG7 Full details
- Intel Core i7-10710U Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400H Full details
- Intel Core i7-10810U Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6550M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5500M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M5000M Full details
- AMD Radeon 780M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A500 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M4000M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon 760M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5300M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX570 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5500M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M3000M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M295X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M395X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M395 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX550 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8970M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX450 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M390X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970M Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.