Titanfall bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD Radeon R7 M370
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Titanfall
1680 × 1050
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Titanfall
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron N3350
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon R7 M370
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1680 × 1050 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD Radeon R7 M370 in the Titanfall with 1680 × 1050 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD Radeon R7 M370, under the context of Titanfall with a screen resolution of 1680 × 1050 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 82.4%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD Radeon R7 M370. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD Radeon R7 M370 will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for Titanfall. The presence of both the Intel Celeron N3350 and AMD Radeon R7 M370 in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your Intel Celeron N3350 CPU Score against the AMD Radeon R7 M370 GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 75.03%
- Processor maximum
- 90.42%
- Graphic card average
- 82.99%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 2.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.85%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 73.3%
- Graphic card maximum
- 88.48%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 19.9%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 60.03%
- Processor maximum
- 72.34%
- Graphic card average
- 82.99%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Core i3-2350M Full details
- AMD A6-3410MX Full details
- Intel Core i3-2348M Full details
- AMD A6-9220 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4012Y Full details
- Intel Celeron 3855U Full details
- Intel Core i3-3227U Full details
- Intel Atom x7-Z8750 Full details
- AMD A6-3420M Full details
- AMD A4-5000 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 Full details
- AMD A9-9420e Full details
- Intel Celeron 1005M Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8435 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8135 Full details
- AMD A6-9200 Full details
- Intel Celeron 3215U Full details
- AMD E2-6110 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2312M Full details
- AMD PRO A4-4350B Full details
- Intel Pentium N3520 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo P9700 Full details
- AMD E2-3800 Full details
- Intel Core i3-370M Full details
- AMD A8-7050 Full details
- AMD QC-4000 Full details
- AMD A6-5357M Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 Full details
- Intel Celeron N3160 Full details
- Intel Pentium 3805U Full details
- Intel Core i7-640UM Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T9900 Full details
- Intel Pentium N3530 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3795 Full details
- AMD A6-3400M Full details
- Intel Celeron N3150 Full details
- Intel Core i7-680UM Full details
- Intel Core i3-380M Full details
- Intel Core i5-430M Full details
- Intel Core i5-2537M Full details
- AMD A4-9125 Full details
- Intel Pentium N3540 Full details
- AMD A6-9210 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T9800 Full details
- AMD A6-5350M Full details
- Intel Core i3-2310M Full details
- Intel Core i3-3217U Full details
- Intel Core i3-2330M Full details
- AMD A4-9120 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA Quadro M520 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M375X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M Full details
- AMD Firepro W5170M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX230 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX130 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M275X Full details
- Intel Iris Plus 650 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6900M Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce MX110 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 940MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 845M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M370X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8790M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930A Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M375 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 930MX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Full details
- Intel Iris Plus 640 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GPU Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 840A Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M500M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M265X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 830A Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 940M Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M275 Full details
- AMD Radeon 610M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 840M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 920MX Full details
- AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8850M Full details
- AMD FirePro M6000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Mobility Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M40003 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.