Knight Online bottleneck calculator
AMD FX-8300 and AMD FirePro W9000
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Knight Online
5120 × 2880
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Knight Online
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD FX-8300
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD FirePro W9000
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
5120 × 2880 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the AMD FX-8300 and AMD FirePro W9000, the AMD FirePro W9000 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD FX-8300 performance in the Knight Online with 5120 × 2880 and 1 monitor. While the AMD FX-8300 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD FirePro W9000 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD FX-8300 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 5120 × 2880 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 5.3% graphics card bottleneck when performing Knight Online.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD FX-8300 and AMD FirePro W9000, under the context of Knight Online with a screen resolution of 5120 × 2880 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 71.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your AMD FX-8300 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD FirePro W9000. In such cases, the AMD FirePro W9000 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD FX-8300. Therefore, the AMD FirePro W9000 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD FX-8300 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD FirePro W9000 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD FirePro W9000 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD FX-8300 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD FX-8300 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your AMD FX-8300 CPU Score with the AMD FirePro W9000 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 12%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 66.23%
- Processor maximum
- 79.65%
- Graphic card average
- 83.16%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.79%
- Processor maximum
- 99.56%
- Graphic card average
- 83.16%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 29.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 52.99%
- Processor maximum
- 63.72%
- Graphic card average
- 83.16%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Core i5-3470 Full details
- AMD Athlon 3000G Full details
- Intel Core i5-3570S Full details
- Intel Core i5-3450S Full details
- AMD Athlon 320GE Full details
- Intel Core i5-3470S Full details
- Intel Core i5-4440S Full details
- AMD Athlon PRO 300GE Full details
- AMD FX-6330 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3550S Full details
- Intel Core i5-4670T Full details
- Intel Core i5-3450 Full details
- Intel Core i3-6320 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G6605 Full details
- Intel Core i3-7300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 240GE Full details
- AMD FX-6350 Full details
- Intel Celeron G6900 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4570R Full details
- Intel Core i5-4460S Full details
- Intel Core i7-2600S Full details
- AMD FX-8120 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4430 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4690T Full details
- Intel Core i3-7100 Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100 Full details
- AMD FX-6300 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2100GE Full details
- Intel Core i5-3330 Full details
- AMD PRO A12-8870 Full details
- Intel Core i3-6300T Full details
- Intel Core i3-6098P Full details
- AMD FX-8100 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4590T Full details
- Intel Celeron N5095 Full details
- AMD FX-6200 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3570T Full details
- AMD Athlon 200GE Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5639 Full details
- Intel Xeon Bronze 3104 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5647 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5640 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5667 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1603 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1260L Full details
- AMD Opteron 3365 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 590 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 390X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro W5500 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 390 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX590 GME Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 480 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5500 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 290 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 290X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 470 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Duo Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Full details
- Intel Arc A380 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 285 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M5000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Full details
- AMD FirePro W9100 Full details
- AMD Radeon PRO W6400 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5300 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for AMD FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro W9000 6GB GDDR5 100-505859 Graphics Card 5 new from 469.00 $. 1 used from 378.00 $. Last updated 56 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 469.96 $ |
Yes
|
|
AMD FirePro W9000 6GB GDDR5 384-bit PCI Express 3.0 x16 Full Height Video Card |
|
Yes | 689.96 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
FX-8300
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Bulk Package FX-8300 |
|
Yes | 90.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX) 1 new from 106.00 $. 8 used from 34.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 106.06 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.