The Walking Dead: Michonne bottleneck calculator
Intel Core2 Duo E8300 and NVIDIA Quadro P400
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
The Walking Dead: Michonne
1280 × 800
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
The Walking Dead: Michonne
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core2 Duo E8300
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA Quadro P400
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1280 × 800 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core2 Duo E8300 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA Quadro P400 in the The Walking Dead: Michonne with 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA Quadro P400 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core2 Duo E8300 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA Quadro P400 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core2 Duo E8300 and NVIDIA Quadro P400, with a screen resolution of 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 14.6% bottleneck for The Walking Dead: Michonne.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core2 Duo E8300 and NVIDIA Quadro P400, under the context of The Walking Dead: Michonne with a screen resolution of 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 64.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA Quadro P400 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core2 Duo E8300 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA Quadro P400 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core2 Duo E8300 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA Quadro P400 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core2 Duo E8300 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA Quadro P400. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core2 Duo E8300 CPU Score and NVIDIA Quadro P400 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.63%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 76.49%
- Graphic card maximum
- 92.57%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 18.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.63%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 61.2%
- Graphic card maximum
- 74.06%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 71.77%
- Processor maximum
- 86.42%
- Graphic card average
- 83.05%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i3-3220 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 830 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3258 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2125 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 820 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3260 Full details
- Intel Pentium G2140 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B25 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3430 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 910e Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 630 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 631 Full details
- Intel Celeron G5905T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B93 Full details
- Intel Celeron G3900 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3450 Full details
- AMD A6-3670 Full details
- AMD A8-3820 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3455E Full details
- Intel Pentium G3440 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 973 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 920 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 Full details
- Intel Core i3-3210 Full details
- Intel Core i3-3225 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 635 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3460 Full details
- Intel Celeron G3930 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 640 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B40 Full details
- Intel Celeron G4900T Full details
- Intel Core i5-650 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3455 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B45 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 925 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3330 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5420 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5462 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5472 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3353 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5430 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1220L V2 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5430 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3350 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5520 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon HD 4850 X2 Full details
- Intel UHD Graphics 620 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Athlon 3000G Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 340 Full details
- AMD Radeon 530 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6750 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A12-9730P Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 250 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M460 Full details
- AMD Radeon 535 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A12-9800 Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon 625 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M350 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 430 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M465 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7870K Full details
- AMD Radeon E6760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-9800 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 PRO-7850B Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Full details
- AMD Radeon 620 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M440 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 240 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-8650 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A12-9800E Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 430 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8870E Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A6-9500 Radeon R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7860K Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-9700 Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4850 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 340 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8570 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M445 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8850B Full details
- AMD FirePro M4170 Full details
- AMD Firepro W4190M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 3000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Full details
- AMD FirePro W4170M Full details
- AMD Firepro M4100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1100M Full details
- AMD FirePro W2100 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K220Q Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA Quadro P400
VCQP400-PB
VCQP400-PB
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY NVIDIA Quadro P400 Professional Graphics Board - (VCQP400-PB) Graphic Cards 5 new from 83.00 $. 4 used from 91.00 $. Last updated 30 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 83.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Core2 Duo E8300
Core 2 Duo E8300
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 2.83GHz Core 2 Duo E8300 Desktop Processor (EU80570PJ0736M) 1 new from 99.00 $. 2 used from 24.00 $. Last updated 28 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 99.95 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.