Garry's Mod bottleneck calculator
Intel Core i3-3220T and AMD FirePro V7900
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Garry's Mod
3440 × 1440
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Garry's Mod
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core i3-3220T
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD FirePro V7900
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
3440 × 1440 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core i3-3220T may serve as a bottleneck for the AMD FirePro V7900 in the Garry's Mod with 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor. Although the AMD FirePro V7900 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core i3-3220T might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the AMD FirePro V7900 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core i3-3220T and AMD FirePro V7900, with a screen resolution of 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 5.1% bottleneck for Garry's Mod.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core i3-3220T and AMD FirePro V7900, under the context of Garry's Mod with a screen resolution of 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.2%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 71.5%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your AMD FirePro V7900 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core i3-3220T fails to handle and transmit data to the AMD FirePro V7900 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core i3-3220T will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the AMD FirePro V7900 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core i3-3220T capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the AMD FirePro V7900. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core i3-3220T CPU Score and AMD FirePro V7900 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 11%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 66.91%
- Processor maximum
- 80.5%
- Graphic card average
- 83.11%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.09%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 82.57%
- Graphic card maximum
- 99.37%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 28.8%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 53.53%
- Processor maximum
- 64.4%
- Graphic card average
- 83.11%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Celeron J4105 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4150T Full details
- AMD FX-770K Full details
- Intel Core i5-2500T Full details
- Intel Core i7-940 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 760K Full details
- AMD A8 PRO-7600B Full details
- Intel Celeron J4125 Full details
- AMD A10-5800K Full details
- Intel Core i7-930 Full details
- Intel Pentium G4560T Full details
- AMD FX-670K Full details
- AMD PRO A10-9700E Full details
- AMD FX-4300 Full details
- AMD PRO A8-8670E Full details
- Intel Core i7-860 Full details
- AMD A8-8650 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3470T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1035T Full details
- AMD A8-6600K Full details
- AMD FX-4170 Full details
- AMD A10-5800B Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8770E Full details
- AMD PRO A12-8870E Full details
- Intel Pentium G4600T Full details
- AMD A10-6790K Full details
- Intel Core i5-4570TE Full details
- Intel Core i7-875K Full details
- Intel Core i5-4200H Full details
- AMD FX-4330 Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver J5005 Full details
- AMD A10-6800B Full details
- AMD FX-4320 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4330T Full details
- AMD A10-6700 Full details
- AMD FX-4200 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4160T Full details
- AMD A8-7650K Full details
- Intel Core i7-870 Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100TE Full details
- Intel Xeon X5492 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5470 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3520 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3460 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5630 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5550 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3530 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3540 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5400T Full details
- Intel Xeon X5560 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon RX 550X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5970 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6870 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 450 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 350 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 8 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5830 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M360 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 11 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 540 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7750 Full details
- AMD Radeon E8860 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6790 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega11 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 9 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3100M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Full details
- AMD FirePro M5100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5010M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V7800 Full details
- AMD FirePro W600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P400 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000D Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for AMD FirePro V7900
FirePro V7900
100-505647
FirePro V7900 SDI
FirePro V7900 SDI
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI FirePro V7900 2GB DDR5 4x DisplayPort PCI-Express Video Card |
|
Yes | 93.96 $ |
Yes
|
|
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI 2GB GDDR5 4DisplayPorts PCI-Express Video Card (100-505846) |
|
Yes | 224.06 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Core i3-3220T
Core i3-3220T
Core i3-3220T
Core i3-3220T
Core i3-3220T
Core i3-3220T
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core i3-3220T Dual-Core Processor 2.8 Ghz 3MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637i33220T 4 new from 59.00 $. 2 used from 39.00 $. Last updated 42 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 59.40 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.