Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron E3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth
3840 × 2160
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron E3200
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
3840 × 2160 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the Intel Celeron E3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 in the Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron E3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200, under the context of Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth with a screen resolution of 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.6%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the Intel Celeron E3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the Intel Celeron E3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for Sid Meier's Civilization: Beyond Earth. The presence of both the Intel Celeron E3200 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your Intel Celeron E3200 CPU Score against the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 65.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.65%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 25.83%
- Graphic card maximum
- 31.25%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 72.5%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.65%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 20.66%
- Graphic card maximum
- 25%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 57.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.65%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 32.29%
- Graphic card maximum
- 39.06%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Pentium E6500 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 245 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8200 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6850 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B24 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6600 Full details
- Intel Celeron G530 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7500 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 B53 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 250 Full details
- Intel Pentium G640T Full details
- AMD Sempron 3850 Full details
- AMD A4-4000 Full details
- Intel Celeron J1900 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 550 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8400 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7600 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6800 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 260 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 255 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 245e Full details
- Intel Pentium E5800 Full details
- Intel Celeron G540 Full details
- AMD E2-3200 Full details
- Intel Pentium E5400 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 215 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8135 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7750 Full details
- Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6700 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7200 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 240e Full details
- Intel Core i3-3229Y Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6750 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7400 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6300 Full details
- Intel Pentium E5500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 240 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 220 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B22 Full details
- AMD A4-3420 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3503 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3505 Full details
- Intel Xeon 5160 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3060 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3070 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Full details
- AMD Radeon VII Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7600 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7700S Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6600 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro W5700 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA TITAN X Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A2000 Full details
- Intel Arc A770 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Full details
- Intel Arc A750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro GP100 Full details
- AMD Radeon PRO W6600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro VII Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla P40 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M6000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4200 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.