Quantcast

F1 2016 bottleneck calculator

AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

1
Game
2
CPU
3
GPU
4
Resolution
Video game
F1 2016
Resolution
3200 × 1800
Monitors
1 monitor
Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

1. Select game

Currently selected:

F1 2016 image
F1 2016

4. Select resolution

Currently selected:
3200 × 1800 resolution
(1 monitor)

Calculation result

Bottleneck percentage

When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in the F1 2016 with 3200 × 1800 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.

Gauge that shows 0% of bottleneck

To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.

Processor and graphic card utilizations

In a computing setup featuring the AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, under the context of F1 2016 with a screen resolution of 3200 × 1800 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.2%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 82%.

It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.

Utilization chart of AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 inF1 2016 with 3200 × 1800 and 1 monitor

Playability

Playable
Frames per second
103.07 FPS
View the full FPS calculation

A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.

Heatmap of bottleneck

The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."

The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for F1 2016. The presence of both the AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.

Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing AMD E2-1800 score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 score inF1 2016 with 3200 × 1800 and 1 monitor

Mapping your AMD E2-1800 CPU Score against the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.

General bottleneck calculations

The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.

General tasks bottleneck result

For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.

Bottleneck percentage
63.7%
Bottleneck reason
Processor
Playable
Frames per second
31.9 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
82.37%
Processor maximum
100%
Graphic card average
27.29%
Graphic card maximum
33.14%

CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result

When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.

Bottleneck percentage
71%
Bottleneck reason
Processor
Playable
Frames per second
31.9 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
82.37%
Processor maximum
100%
Graphic card average
21.83%
Graphic card maximum
26.51%

GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result

In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.

Bottleneck percentage
54.6%
Bottleneck reason
Processor
Playable
Frames per second
39.88 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
82.37%
Processor maximum
100%
Graphic card average
34.12%
Graphic card maximum
41.42%

Bottleneck solutions

Replace processor

If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.

Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 inF1 2016 with 3200 × 1800 and 1 monitor

Impact of Changing Screen Resolution

Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.

Read more

Replace graphic cards

When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.

Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD E2-1800 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 inF1 2016 with 3200 × 1800 and 1 monitor

Impact of Changing Screen Resolution

If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.

Read more

Offers for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Merchant location:

Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.

Bottleneck calculator types

Select purpose bottleneck calculator

Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.

Select game bottleneck calculator