Insurgency bottleneck calculator
AMD Sempron 2500+ and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Insurgency
800 × 600
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Insurgency
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Sempron 2500+
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
800 × 600 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the AMD Sempron 2500+ and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 in the Insurgency with 800 × 600 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Sempron 2500+ and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240, under the context of Insurgency with a screen resolution of 800 × 600 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 77.6%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the AMD Sempron 2500+ and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the AMD Sempron 2500+ and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for Insurgency. The presence of both the AMD Sempron 2500+ and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your AMD Sempron 2500+ CPU Score against the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 11.3%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 65.64%
- Processor maximum
- 79.93%
- Graphic card average
- 82.12%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 81.82%
- Processor maximum
- 99.92%
- Graphic card average
- 81.89%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 29.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 52.51%
- Processor maximum
- 63.95%
- Graphic card average
- 82.12%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Atom 330 Full details
- AMD Sempron 3600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron 440 Full details
- Intel Celeron D 360 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 805 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3300+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Full details
- Intel Atom E3825 Full details
- AMD Sempron LE-1250 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Full details
- AMD Sempron 3300+ Full details
- AMD Sempron LE-1100 Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3400+ Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Athlon 2850e Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2050 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 4000+ Full details
- AMD Athlon II 170u Full details
- AMD Sempron LE-1200 Full details
- AMD Athlon II 160u Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Sempron 3200+ Full details
- AMD Sempron LE-1150 Full details
- Intel Celeron D 356 Full details
- AMD Sempron 2600+ Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Athlon XP 3000+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 2650e Full details
- Intel Celeron D 352 Full details
- Intel Celeron 430 Full details
- AMD Sempron 3000+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 3800+ Full details
- AMD Sempron 3400+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 2800+ Full details
- AMD Sempron 3100+ Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Sempron 2400+ Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- Intel Mobile Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Sempron 3500+ Full details
- Intel Celeron D 347 Full details
- Intel Celeron 420 Full details
- Intel Pentium 4 Full details
- AMD Sempron 2800+ Full details
- Intel Atom D2500 Full details
- Intel Atom D410 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7650A Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 3020e Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8830B Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8800B Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M315 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 710A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7660G Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5570 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M420 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8690A Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7660D Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 2 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Athlon Silver 3050e Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 330 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8650G Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8670D Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A8-8600B Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A10-8700B Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores Full details
- AMD Radeon R6 A10-8700P Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 240 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 3870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6570 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8570D Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M320 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M240 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7560D Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7640G Full details
- AMD Radeon 3020e Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 3850 AGP Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 1000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V3800 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 600 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K180Q Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V7750 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V5700 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 410 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.