Quantcast

Prey bottleneck calculator

AMD Sempron 3000+ and AMD FirePro 3D V8700

1
Game
2
CPU
3
GPU
4
Resolution
Video game
Prey
Resolution
3840 × 2160
Monitors
1 monitor
Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

1. Select game

Currently selected:

Prey image
Prey

4. Select resolution

Currently selected:
3840 × 2160 resolution
(1 monitor)

Calculation result

Bottleneck percentage

In a system configuration featuring the AMD Sempron 3000+ and AMD FirePro 3D V8700, the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD Sempron 3000+ performance in the Prey with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor. While the AMD Sempron 3000+ is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD Sempron 3000+ processing abilities is advisable.

Gauge that shows 7% of bottleneck

With a screen resolution of 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 7.2% graphics card bottleneck when performing Prey.

Processor and graphic card utilizations

In a computing setup featuring the AMD Sempron 3000+ and AMD FirePro 3D V8700, under the context of Prey with a screen resolution of 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 69.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.

It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.

Utilization chart of AMD Sempron 3000+ and AMD FirePro 3D V8700 inPrey with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

Playability

Playable
Frames per second
10.08 FPS
View the full FPS calculation

A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.

Heatmap of bottleneck

During gameplay scenarios, your AMD Sempron 3000+ might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the AMD FirePro 3D V8700. In such cases, the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD Sempron 3000+. Therefore, the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD Sempron 3000+ capabilities untapped.

In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 features.

One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD Sempron 3000+ is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD Sempron 3000+ is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.

To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.

Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing AMD Sempron 3000+ score and AMD FirePro 3D V8700 score inPrey with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

By matching your AMD Sempron 3000+ CPU Score with the AMD FirePro 3D V8700 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.

General bottleneck calculations

The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.

General tasks bottleneck result

For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.

Bottleneck percentage
0%
Playable
Frames per second
20.67 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
74.92%
Processor maximum
90.33%
Graphic card average
82.94%
Graphic card maximum
100%

CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result

When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.

Bottleneck percentage
3.2%
Bottleneck reason
Processor
Playable
Frames per second
22.64 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
82.06%
Processor maximum
100%
Graphic card average
72.67%
Graphic card maximum
88.56%

GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result

In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.

Bottleneck percentage
19.3%
Bottleneck reason
Graphic card
Playable
Frames per second
20.67 FPS

Utilizations

Processor average
59.94%
Processor maximum
72.27%
Graphic card average
82.94%
Graphic card maximum
100%

Bottleneck solutions

Replace processor

If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.

Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD Sempron 3000+ and AMD FirePro 3D V8700 inPrey with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

Impact of Changing Screen Resolution

Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.

Read more

Replace graphic cards

When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.

Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of AMD Sempron 3000+ and AMD FirePro 3D V8700 inPrey with 3840 × 2160 and 1 monitor

Impact of Changing Screen Resolution

If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.

Read more

Bottleneck calculator types

Select purpose bottleneck calculator

Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.

Select game bottleneck calculator