Euro Truck Simulator 2 bottleneck calculator
Intel Core i5-3340 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Euro Truck Simulator 2
1440 × 900
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Euro Truck Simulator 2
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core i5-3340
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1440 × 900 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core i5-3340 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 in the Euro Truck Simulator 2 with 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core i5-3340 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core i5-3340 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465, with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 2.3% bottleneck for Euro Truck Simulator 2.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core i5-3340 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465, under the context of Euro Truck Simulator 2 with a screen resolution of 1440 × 900 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 73.6%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core i5-3340 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core i5-3340 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core i5-3340 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core i5-3340 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 13.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 65.23%
- Processor maximum
- 78.48%
- Graphic card average
- 83.11%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 81.53%
- Processor maximum
- 98.1%
- Graphic card average
- 83.11%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 30.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 52.18%
- Processor maximum
- 62.79%
- Graphic card average
- 83.11%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Full details
- Intel Core i7-4790 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4770 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4770K Full details
- Intel Core i7-980 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 1300X Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Full details
- AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-4790S Full details
- Intel Core i7-990X Full details
- AMD Athlon Gold 3150G Full details
- Intel Core i7-4771 Full details
- Intel Core i7-6700T Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-3770 Full details
- Intel Core i3-9100F Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Full details
- Intel Core i7-3770K Full details
- Intel Core i5-7600K Full details
- Intel Core i3-9100 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4790T Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-4820K Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2623 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2124 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3680 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5690 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2430 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3690 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5675 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3670 Full details
- Intel Xeon Silver 4112 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1290 V2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon HD 6970 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6950 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5970 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 350 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 450 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 540 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 11 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 M360 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4300 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K280Q Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 6000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro V9800 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K2 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8800 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3100M Full details
- AMD FirePro V7900 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Full details
- AMD FirePro M5100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V7800 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for Intel Core i5-3340
Core i5-3340
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core i5-3340 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.1 GHz 6M 77W LGA1155 |
|
Yes | 41.31 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.