Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 bottleneck calculator
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
1280 × 1024
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1280 × 1024 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X performance in the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 with 1280 × 1024 and 1 monitor. While the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 1280 × 1024 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 4.4% graphics card bottleneck when performing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, under the context of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 with a screen resolution of 1280 × 1024 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 72%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.3%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti. In such cases, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X CPU Score with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 50.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 37.05%
- Processor maximum
- 44.54%
- Graphic card average
- 83.19%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 38.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 46.31%
- Processor maximum
- 55.67%
- Graphic card average
- 83.19%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 60.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 29.64%
- Processor maximum
- 35.63%
- Graphic card average
- 83.19%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Core i7-13700K Full details
- Intel Core i9-13900 Full details
- Intel Core i7-13700KF Full details
- AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Full details
- Intel Core i7-14700F Full details
- Intel Core i7-14700 Full details
- Intel Core i9-12900KS Full details
- Intel Core i9-13900T Full details
- Intel Core i5-14600KF Full details
- Intel Core i9-12900K Full details
- Intel Core i9-12900KF Full details
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Full details
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX Full details
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Full details
- Intel Core i5-13600K Full details
- Intel Core i5-13600KF Full details
- Intel Core i5-14600K Full details
- Intel Core i7-13700F Full details
- Intel Core i7-13700 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Full details
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X Full details
- Intel Core i9-12900F Full details
- AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Full details
- Intel Core i7-12700K Full details
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Full details
- Intel Core i7-12700KF Full details
- Intel Core i5-14600 Full details
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Full details
- Intel Xeon w5-3435X Full details
- Intel Xeon w5-2465X Full details
- AMD EPYC 7452 Full details
- AMD EPYC 8224P Full details
- AMD EPYC 7542 Full details
- AMD EPYC 7402 Full details
- Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y Full details
- AMD EPYC 73F3 Full details
- AMD EPYC 7313P Full details
- Intel Xeon Gold 6338N Full details
- AMD EPYC 7D12 Full details
- AMD EPYC 9124 Full details
- AMD EPYC 7402P Full details
- Intel Xeon W-3275M Full details
- AMD EPYC 7352 Full details
- Intel Xeon w5-2455X Full details
- AMD EPYC 7551P Full details
- AMD EPYC 7313 Full details
- Intel Xeon w5-3425 Full details
- Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 Full details
- Intel Xeon Gold 6230R Full details
- Intel Xeon Silver 4510 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Full details
- Intel Arc A380 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 285 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6300 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970 Full details
- AMD Radeon Eng Sample: 100-000000560-40_Y Full details
- AMD Radeon Sky 500 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 370 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 460 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5300 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W9000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Adapter Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8000 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GV-N66TOC-2GD
66NPH7DV6XXZ
GTX660 TI-DC2T-2GD5
N660TI TF 3GD5/OC
66NNH7DV6WXZ
66INH7DV6KXZ
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes | 99.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
|
Yes | 222.02 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
1 new from 325.00 $. 1 used from 245.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 325.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
1 new from 379.00 $. 1 used from 198.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 379.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
1 new from 379.00 $. 3 used from 198.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 379.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.