GreedFall bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Arc A770M
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
GreedFall
3440 × 1440
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
GreedFall
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron 6305
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
Intel Arc A770M
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
3440 × 1440 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Arc A770M in the GreedFall with 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Arc A770M, under the context of GreedFall with a screen resolution of 3440 × 1440 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 77.9%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Arc A770M. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Arc A770M will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for GreedFall. The presence of both the Intel Celeron 6305 and Intel Arc A770M in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your Intel Celeron 6305 CPU Score against the Intel Arc A770M GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 48.8%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.05%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 38.5%
- Graphic card maximum
- 46.36%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 59%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.05%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 30.8%
- Graphic card maximum
- 37.09%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 36%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.05%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 48.13%
- Graphic card maximum
- 57.95%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Pentium Silver N5000 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4258U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4288U Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100U Full details
- Intel Core i7-3687U Full details
- Intel Core i5-7Y54 Full details
- AMD A12-9720P Full details
- Intel Core i5-3610ME Full details
- Intel Core i5-3320M Full details
- AMD PRO A12-9800B Full details
- Intel Core i5-3340M Full details
- Intel Core i7-3537U Full details
- Intel Core m5-6Y57 Full details
- AMD A10-9600P Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8730B Full details
- Intel Core i5-2540M Full details
- Intel Pentium 6405U Full details
- Intel Atom T5700 Full details
- Intel Core i7-3667U Full details
- Intel Core i7-4650U Full details
- Intel Core i7-2620M Full details
- Intel Celeron N4100 Full details
- AMD A12-9700P Full details
- AMD 3020e Full details
- Intel Celeron N4120 Full details
- Intel Core i5-5250U Full details
- Intel Core i7-2640M Full details
- Intel Core i5-3210M Full details
- Intel Core i7-8500Y Full details
- Intel Core i7-4500U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4300U Full details
- AMD PRO A12-8830B Full details
- Intel Core i5-5200U Full details
- Intel Core i3-4100M Full details
- Intel Core i5-4310U Full details
- AMD PRO A10-9700B Full details
- AMD FX-9800P Full details
- Intel Core i5-3230M Full details
- AMD A10-9620P Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver N5030 Full details
- Intel Core i3-7020U Full details
- AMD PRO A12-8800B Full details
- Intel Core i5-5350U Full details
- Intel Core m3-7Y30 Full details
- Intel Core i5-7Y57 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4510U Full details
- Intel Core i3-5157U Full details
- Intel Core i5-4210U Full details
- Intel Core i5-2450M Full details
- Intel Core i7-640M Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A5500 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A4500 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A5000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A4000 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6800S Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6700S Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6650M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7600S Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6700M Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A3000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 1000 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6800M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A2000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A1000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6550M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.