GreedFall bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron 887 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design)
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
GreedFall
5120 × 4096
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
GreedFall
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron 887
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design)
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
5120 × 4096 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the Intel Celeron 887 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) could potentially act as a bottleneck to the Intel Celeron 887 performance in the GreedFall with 5120 × 4096 and 1 monitor. While the Intel Celeron 887 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the Intel Celeron 887 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 5120 × 4096 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 6.5% graphics card bottleneck when performing GreedFall.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron 887 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design), under the context of GreedFall with a screen resolution of 5120 × 4096 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 70.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your Intel Celeron 887 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design). In such cases, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the Intel Celeron 887. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the Intel Celeron 887 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the Intel Celeron 887 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the Intel Celeron 887 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your Intel Celeron 887 CPU Score with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Max-Q Design) GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 53.5%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.48%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 34.98%
- Graphic card maximum
- 42.41%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 62.8%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.48%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 27.98%
- Graphic card maximum
- 33.93%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 41.9%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.48%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 43.72%
- Graphic card maximum
- 53.01%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Core i3-330UM Full details
- Intel Celeron U3400 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-56 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U7300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-62 Full details
- AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5300 Full details
- Intel Pentium T2310 Full details
- AMD E1-6010 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-52 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5500 Full details
- AMD TurionX2 Mobile RM-70 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3735F Full details
- Intel Pentium T2330 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2830 Full details
- Intel Celeron T1600 Full details
- Intel Pentium U5400 Full details
- AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-70 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3735E Full details
- Intel Pentium T2370 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5250 Full details
- AMD Turion RM-70 Full details
- Intel Celeron 867 Full details
- Intel Pentium T2390 Full details
- Intel Celeron 857 Full details
- AMD E1-6015 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U9600 Full details
- Intel Celeron U3600 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5450 Full details
- Intel Celeron 847E Full details
- AMD E-450 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo U9300 Full details
- Intel Atom N2800 Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2600 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo L7100 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo T5200 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-50 Full details
- Intel Celeron 925 Full details
- Intel Celeron SU2300 Full details
- AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile TL-58 Full details
- AMD G-T56N Full details
- Intel Celeron 847 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2806 Full details
- AMD Athlon II Neo N36L Full details
- Intel Pentium SU4100 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2815 Full details
- AMD E2-2000 Full details
- Intel Atom Z3736F Full details
- Intel Core Duo T2700 Full details
- Intel Celeron N2820 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A5500 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A4500 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A5000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A4000 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6800S Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6700S Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6650M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7600S Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6700M Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A3000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 1000 Ada Generation Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6800M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Full details
- Intel Arc A770M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A2000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A1000 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6550M Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600M Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Max-Q Design) Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.