Doom bottleneck calculator
AMD FX-4100 and AMD Radeon R9 285
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Doom
7680 × 4320
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Doom
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD FX-4100
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD Radeon R9 285
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
7680 × 4320 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The AMD FX-4100 may serve as a bottleneck for the AMD Radeon R9 285 in the Doom with 7680 × 4320 and 1 monitor. Although the AMD Radeon R9 285 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the AMD FX-4100 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the AMD Radeon R9 285 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the AMD FX-4100 and AMD Radeon R9 285, with a screen resolution of 7680 × 4320 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 10.8% bottleneck for Doom.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD FX-4100 and AMD Radeon R9 285, under the context of Doom with a screen resolution of 7680 × 4320 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.2%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 67.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your AMD Radeon R9 285 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the AMD FX-4100 fails to handle and transmit data to the AMD Radeon R9 285 at an adequate speed. As a result, the AMD FX-4100 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the AMD Radeon R9 285 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the AMD FX-4100 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 285. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your AMD FX-4100 CPU Score and AMD Radeon R9 285 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 80.85%
- Processor maximum
- 97.21%
- Graphic card average
- 83.17%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 9.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.16%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 68.43%
- Graphic card maximum
- 82.29%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 14%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 64.68%
- Processor maximum
- 77.77%
- Graphic card average
- 83.17%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i5-2400 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4170 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 950 Full details
- AMD A12-9800 Full details
- Intel Pentium G4600 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4360 Full details
- Intel Core i5-2310 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4460T Full details
- AMD PRO A10-9700 Full details
- Intel Core i3-6100T Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 880K Full details
- Intel Core i5-2320 Full details
- AMD FX-6100 Full details
- AMD PRO A12-9800 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5420 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5400 Full details
- AMD PRO A10-8850B Full details
- Intel Pentium G4620 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Full details
- Intel Core i3-7100T Full details
- Intel Core i5-2380P Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 845 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5500 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5600 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Full details
- Intel Core i3-4370 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3330S Full details
- Intel Core i5-3335S Full details
- AMD FX-6120 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3340S Full details
- Intel Core i3-4130 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 860K Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver J5040 Full details
- AMD A10-7860K Full details
- Intel Core i3-4360T Full details
- AMD A8-9600 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5500T Full details
- Intel Xeon W3580 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5640 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5638 Full details
- AMD Opteron 3280 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1265L Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1607 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5630 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1225 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3470 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3570 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3480 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5570 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6300 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970 Full details
- AMD Radeon Eng Sample: 100-000000560-40_Y Full details
- AMD Radeon Sky 500 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 370 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 460 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7850 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W9000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Adapter Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2200 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for AMD Radeon R9 285
Mini IceQ X²
DD
ITX Compact
STRIX
WINDFORCE 2X
Dual-X
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 new from 299.00 $. 2 used from 59.00 $. Last updated 54 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 59.72 $ |
Yes
|
|
XFX Double D R9 285 918MHz 2GB DDR5 DP HDMI 2XDVI Graphics Card R9285ACDFC |
|
Yes | 89.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
MSI AMD Radeon R9 280X, 3GB GDDR5, PCI Express 3.0 Graphics Card R9 280X Gaming 3G |
|
Yes | 240.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
15 new from 384.00 $. 3 used from 349.00 $. Last updated 43 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 384.99 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
FX-4100
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FX 4100 4-Core Processor, 3.6 4 Socket AM3+ FD4100WMGUSBX 9 new from 298.00 $. 4 used from 19.00 $. Last updated 54 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 19.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
AMD FX-Series FX 4100 3.6 GHz Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4100WMW4KGU Socket AM3+ |
|
Yes | 19.99 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.