StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty bottleneck calculator
Intel Core2 Duo E4700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty
1280 × 800
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core2 Duo E4700
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1280 × 800 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER could potentially act as a bottleneck to the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 performance in the StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty with 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor. While the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 1.9% graphics card bottleneck when performing StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, under the context of StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty with a screen resolution of 1280 × 800 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 73.9%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your Intel Core2 Duo E4700 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. In such cases, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the Intel Core2 Duo E4700. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the Intel Core2 Duo E4700 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your Intel Core2 Duo E4700 CPU Score with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 69.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.8%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 22.81%
- Graphic card maximum
- 27.55%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 75.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.8%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 18.25%
- Graphic card maximum
- 22.04%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 62.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.8%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 28.51%
- Graphic card maximum
- 34.44%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- AMD Athlon 5200B Full details
- Intel Celeron E3200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 5050e Full details
- Intel Pentium E2220 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Full details
- AMD Athlon 4450B Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 260u Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6320 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Full details
- Intel Pentium E2200 Full details
- Intel Celeron E1400 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4500 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6420 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 4850e Full details
- AMD Athlon 7450 Full details
- Intel Celeron E3300 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 960 Full details
- Intel Pentium 997 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron E1500 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6300 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2160 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ Full details
- Intel Celeron J3060 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 4050e Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Full details
- Intel Pentium D 950 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2180 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Full details
- Intel Pentium E2210 Full details
- AMD Athlon 4450e Full details
- Intel Celeron E1200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2140 Full details
- AMD Opteron 180 Full details
- Intel Xeon 5130 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5503 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3050 Full details
- AMD Opteron 175 Full details
- AMD Opteron 185 Full details
- AMD Opteron 165 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 7700S Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6600 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro W5700 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5700 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA TITAN X Full details
- NVIDIA RTX A2000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Full details
- Intel Arc A770 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Full details
- Intel Arc A750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5600 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Full details
- NVIDIA RTX 500 Ada Generation Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 Fury Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon PRO W6600 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro VII Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla P40 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M6000 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4200 (Max-Q Design) Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Twin X2 OC
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Phoenix
STRIX GAMING OC
VCG16504SSFPPB
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes | 52.04 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
1 new from 272.00 $. 3 used from 100.00 $. Last updated 44 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 100.75 $ |
Yes
|
|
EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 Super SC Ultra Gaming, 4GB GDDR6, Dual Fan, Metal Backplate, 04G-P4-1357-KR 12 new from 197.00 $. 8 used from 137.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 197.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
Yes | 199.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
1 new from 427.00 $. 2 used from 222.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 222.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.