Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 bottleneck calculator
Intel Pentium E2200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
4096 × 3072
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Pentium E2200
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
4096 × 3072 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the Intel Pentium E2200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800, the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 could potentially act as a bottleneck to the Intel Pentium E2200 performance in the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 with 4096 × 3072 and 1 monitor. While the Intel Pentium E2200 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the Intel Pentium E2200 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 4096 × 3072 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 0.7% graphics card bottleneck when performing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Pentium E2200 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800, under the context of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 with a screen resolution of 4096 × 3072 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 74.4%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your Intel Pentium E2200 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800. In such cases, the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the Intel Pentium E2200. Therefore, the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the Intel Pentium E2200 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the Intel Pentium E2200 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the Intel Pentium E2200 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your Intel Pentium E2200 CPU Score with the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 47.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 39.45%
- Processor maximum
- 47.62%
- Graphic card average
- 82.85%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 33.9%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 49.31%
- Processor maximum
- 59.52%
- Graphic card average
- 82.85%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 57.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 31.56%
- Processor maximum
- 38.09%
- Graphic card average
- 82.85%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Full details
- AMD Athlon 4450B Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 260u Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6320 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron E1400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Full details
- Intel Celeron E1500 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6300 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2160 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5800+ Full details
- Intel Celeron J3060 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 4050e Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Full details
- Intel Pentium D 950 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2180 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Full details
- Intel Pentium E2210 Full details
- AMD Athlon 4450e Full details
- Intel Celeron E1200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-57 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Full details
- Intel Pentium E2140 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 940 Full details
- Intel Pentium D 830 Full details
- Intel Celeron G465 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 Full details
- Intel Celeron G470 Full details
- AMD Sempron 2650 Full details
- Intel Celeron J1800 Full details
- Intel Celeron 1019Y Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 250u Full details
- AMD Sempron 150 Full details
- AMD Sempron 140 Full details
- AMD Sempron 145 Full details
- AMD Opteron 175 Full details
- AMD Opteron 185 Full details
- AMD Opteron 165 Full details
- AMD Opteron 1212 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- AMD Radeon E6760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-9800 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 PRO-7850B Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Full details
- AMD Radeon 620 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M440 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 240 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-8650 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A12-9800E Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 430 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-8870E Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A6-9500 Radeon R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7860K Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-9700 Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4850 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 340 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8570 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M445 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8850B Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-9800E Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7850K Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-9700E Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A10-9630P Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 Extreme Edition Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M260DX Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7680 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 PRO-7800B Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8770E Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-9600 Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-8800P Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4830 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7670K Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A6-9500 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7890K Full details
- AMD FirePro W2100 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K220Q Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 2000 Full details
- AMD FirePro M4150 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V4800 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for Intel Pentium E2200
Pentium E2200
Pentium E2200
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Processor, 2.2 GHz, 1M L2 Cache, 800MHz FSB, LGA775 |
|
Yes | 9.95 $ |
Yes
|
|
Intel SLA8X Pentium Dual Core E2200 2.2GHz 1MB Cache 800MHz LGA775 1 new from 25.00 $. 3 used from 6.00 $. Last updated 28 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 25.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.