Assassin's Creed Syndicate bottleneck calculator
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 and NVIDIA GRID K520
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Assassin's Creed Syndicate
1280 × 1024
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Assassin's Creed Syndicate
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GRID K520
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1280 × 1024 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
When configuring a high-performance computing setup, it's imperative to ensure that each hardware component is well-matched with its counterparts to provide seamless and optimal system performance. In the case of the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 and NVIDIA GRID K520 in the Assassin's Creed Syndicate with 1280 × 1024 and 1 monitor, it appears that hardware compatibility has been achieved superbly, as evidenced by the calculated bottleneck percentage of 0%.
To elaborate, a bottleneck occurs when one component restricts the maximum efficiency of another, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced system effectiveness. However, in this configuration, that is not a concern. Any bottleneck percentage below 5% is generally deemed insignificant, and our current bottleneck value sits at 0%, which means you can expect superior system performance.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 and NVIDIA GRID K520, under the context of Assassin's Creed Syndicate with a screen resolution of 1280 × 1024 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 77.7%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
The heatmap serves as a graphical representation to further confirm the compatibility between the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 and NVIDIA GRID K520. On this heatmap, the x-axis corresponds to the CPU Score, and the y-axis corresponds to the GPU Score. In a perfectly balanced system such as this, the intersection point of the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 and NVIDIA GRID K520 will fall within the "no bottleneck zone."
The "no bottleneck zone" is an area on the heatmap where the hardware components are not only compatible but are also optimally matched to provide peak system performance. When the intersection of the CPU and GPU scores resides in this zone, it is a strong indicator that the system is balanced and will deliver excellent performance for Assassin's Creed Syndicate. The presence of both the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 and NVIDIA GRID K520 in this zone confirms that neither component will hinder the performance of the other, leading to a seamless and highly efficient computing experience.
Mapping your Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 CPU Score against the NVIDIA GRID K520 GPU Score can provide a comprehensive view of how these components interact and where bottlenecks are most likely to happen. Leveraging this heatmap data could guide you in making more balanced hardware selections suitable for your specific computing needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 4.3%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 72.02%
- Processor maximum
- 86.64%
- Graphic card average
- 83.13%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.19%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 76.82%
- Graphic card maximum
- 92.34%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 23.4%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 57.62%
- Processor maximum
- 69.31%
- Graphic card average
- 83.13%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- Intel Core i5-6500 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4590 Full details
- Intel Core i5-7400 Full details
- Intel Core i7-2600 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4690 Full details
- AMD FX-8370E Full details
- AMD FX-8300 Full details
- Intel Core i5-6402P Full details
- Intel Core i7-4700EQ Full details
- Intel Core i7-3770T Full details
- Intel Core i3-9100T Full details
- AMD FX-8320 Full details
- Intel Core i7-2600K Full details
- Intel Core i5-4670 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4785T Full details
- Intel Core i5-4690S Full details
- Intel Core i5-5675R Full details
- Intel Core i5-4670K Full details
- Intel Core i5-5675C Full details
- Intel Core i5-6600T Full details
- Intel Core i5-4570 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3570 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4460 Full details
- Intel Core i5-6400 Full details
- Intel Core i5-3570K Full details
- Intel Core i3-7320 Full details
- Intel Core i7-4770TE Full details
- Intel Core i3-7350K Full details
- Intel Core i5-4570S Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2620 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2630L Full details
- Intel Xeon X5687 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1245 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1270 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1240 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2643 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1275 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2430 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1280 Full details
- Intel Xeon W-2104 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1225 v6 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1410 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5672 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5677 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2420 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon Eng Sample: 100-000000560-40_Y Full details
- AMD Radeon Sky 500 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 370 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 460 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560X Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7790 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Adapter Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P600 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7170M Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla C2070 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5100M Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.