Watch Dogs bottleneck calculator
Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 and AMD FirePro W8100
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Watch Dogs
2800 × 2100
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Watch Dogs
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD FirePro W8100
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
2800 × 2100 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 may serve as a bottleneck for the AMD FirePro W8100 in the Watch Dogs with 2800 × 2100 and 1 monitor. Although the AMD FirePro W8100 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the AMD FirePro W8100 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 and AMD FirePro W8100, with a screen resolution of 2800 × 2100 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 6.5% bottleneck for Watch Dogs.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 and AMD FirePro W8100, under the context of Watch Dogs with a screen resolution of 2800 × 2100 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83.3%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 70.4%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your AMD FirePro W8100 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 fails to handle and transmit data to the AMD FirePro W8100 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the AMD FirePro W8100 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the AMD FirePro W8100. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2 CPU Score and AMD FirePro W8100 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 80.7%
- Processor maximum
- 97.04%
- Graphic card average
- 83.16%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 8.8%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.23%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 68.61%
- Graphic card maximum
- 82.44%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 14.3%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 64.56%
- Processor maximum
- 77.63%
- Graphic card average
- 83.16%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 3500X Full details
- Intel Core i7-9700 Full details
- Intel Core i7-9700F Full details
- Intel Core i5-10500 Full details
- Intel Core i9-9900T Full details
- Intel Core i7-8700 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 3500 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Full details
- Intel Core i7-9700E Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Full details
- Intel Core i3-12100T Full details
- Intel Core i7-5960X Full details
- Intel Core i7-10700T Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE Full details
- Intel Core i7-7800X Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300G Full details
- Intel Core i5-11500T Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 5300GE Full details
- Intel Core i3-13100T Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400F Full details
- Intel Core i5-10400 Full details
- AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Full details
- Intel Core i5-10600T Full details
- Intel Core i7-6850K Full details
- Intel Core i5-10505 Full details
- Intel Core i5-9600K Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon Gold 6128 Full details
- Intel Xeon E-2146G Full details
- Intel Xeon D-1581 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon W-2133 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon W-10855M Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon Silver 4114 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6400 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6500 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 5300 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Full details
- Intel Arc A380 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 285 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280X Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 6300 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 380 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8990 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7970 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7950 Full details
- AMD Radeon Sky 500 Full details
- AMD Radeon Eng Sample: 100-000000560-40_Y Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 370 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro 5300 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W9000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Adapter Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro W8100 Graphics Card Graphic Cards 100-505976 2 new from 189.00 $. 1 used from 695.00 $. Last updated 23 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 249.96 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2
Xeon E3-1275 V2
Xeon E3-1275 V2
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1275V2 CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 77W LGA1155 |
|
Yes | 85.86 $ |
Yes
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 Quad-Core Processor 3.5GHz 5.0GT/s 8MB LGA 1155 CPU Oem CM8063701098702 1 new from 746.00 $. 1 used from 314.00 $. Last updated 33 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 746.01 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.