Total War: Rome II bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD FirePro W4300
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Total War: Rome II
6400 × 4800
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Total War: Rome II
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron J4025
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
AMD FirePro W4300
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
6400 × 4800 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Celeron J4025 may serve as a bottleneck for the AMD FirePro W4300 in the Total War: Rome II with 6400 × 4800 and 1 monitor. Although the AMD FirePro W4300 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the AMD FirePro W4300 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD FirePro W4300, with a screen resolution of 6400 × 4800 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 2.3% bottleneck for Total War: Rome II.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD FirePro W4300, under the context of Total War: Rome II with a screen resolution of 6400 × 4800 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 83%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 73.6%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your AMD FirePro W4300 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Celeron J4025 fails to handle and transmit data to the AMD FirePro W4300 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Celeron J4025 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the AMD FirePro W4300 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Celeron J4025 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the AMD FirePro W4300. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Celeron J4025 CPU Score and AMD FirePro W4300 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 14.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 64.41%
- Processor maximum
- 77.49%
- Graphic card average
- 83.12%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 80.51%
- Processor maximum
- 96.86%
- Graphic card average
- 83.12%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 31.2%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 51.53%
- Processor maximum
- 61.99%
- Graphic card average
- 83.12%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- AMD A6-7480 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2105 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3260T Full details
- AMD Phenom 9750 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2100 Full details
- AMD A6-3620 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5370 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 455 Full details
- AMD A6-9500 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9950 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3220 Full details
- Intel Pentium G2120 Full details
- AMD PRO A6-8570 Full details
- Intel Celeron G1850 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300 Full details
- Intel Pentium G2130 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3420 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 905e Full details
- Intel Core i3-560 Full details
- AMD A6-7400K Full details
- Intel Pentium G3240T Full details
- Intel Celeron G1820T Full details
- AMD PRO A4-8350B Full details
- AMD PRO A6-8570E Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 435 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9550 Full details
- AMD A9-9430 Full details
- AMD PRO A6-9500E Full details
- Intel Pentium G2020 Full details
- AMD A6 PRO-7400B Full details
- AMD A6-3600 Full details
- Intel Celeron G1630 Full details
- Intel Celeron G1820 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 440 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9850 Full details
- AMD Phenom 9650 Full details
- Intel Pentium G2030 Full details
- AMD PRO A6-9500 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5350 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 910 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 Full details
- Intel Celeron G1840 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3323 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5345 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5410 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5507 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5603 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5408 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5405 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6970 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5970 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6870 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 350 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6850 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 450 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K280Q Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 6000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro V9800 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K2 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8800 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3100M Full details
- AMD FirePro V7900 Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreBottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.