Mafia III bottleneck calculator
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Mafia III
1024 × 768
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Mafia III
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA Quadro 6000
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1024 × 768 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Core2 Duo E8400 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 in the Mafia III with 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000, with a screen resolution of 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 29.3% bottleneck for Mafia III.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000, under the context of Mafia III with a screen resolution of 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.9%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 53.1%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA Quadro 6000 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA Quadro 6000 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA Quadro 6000. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Core2 Duo E8400 CPU Score and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 22.1%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.79%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 58.51%
- Graphic card maximum
- 70.67%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 37.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.79%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 46.81%
- Graphic card maximum
- 56.54%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 2.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 82.79%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 73.14%
- Graphic card maximum
- 88.34%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core i3-4130 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 860K Full details
- Intel Pentium Silver J5040 Full details
- AMD A10-7860K Full details
- Intel Core i3-4360T Full details
- AMD A8-9600 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5500T Full details
- AMD FX-4350 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Full details
- Intel Core i7-880 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 840 Full details
- AMD PRO A8-9600 Full details
- AMD FX-4150 Full details
- Intel Core i7-960 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4370T Full details
- AMD A10 PRO-7800B Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1065T Full details
- Intel Core i3-4150 Full details
- Intel Core i5-2500S Full details
- AMD A10-7850K Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 870K Full details
- AMD Phenom II X6 1075T Full details
- Intel Core i5-2300 Full details
- Intel Core i7-965 Full details
- AMD A8-7500 Full details
- AMD A10-7870K Full details
- AMD A10-8850 Full details
- Intel Pentium Gold G5420T Full details
- AMD A10 PRO-7850B Full details
- Intel Core i3-4340 Full details
- Intel Celeron J4105 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4150T Full details
- AMD FX-770K Full details
- Intel Core i5-2500T Full details
- Intel Core i7-940 Full details
- AMD Athlon X4 760K Full details
- AMD A8 PRO-7600B Full details
- Intel Xeon X3470 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3570 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3480 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5570 Full details
- Intel Xeon W5590 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3565 Full details
- Intel Xeon W5580 Full details
- AMD Opteron X3421 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5-1603 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5492 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5470 Full details
- Intel Xeon W3520 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 9 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega11 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6790 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 Full details
- AMD Radeon 540X Full details
- AMD Radeon 550X Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 255 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-9830P Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4890 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Full details
- AMD Radeon 630 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4870 X2 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 6 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4870 Full details
- AMD Radeon 540 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7730 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6770 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 Opteron X3421 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5750 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4850 X2 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2000D Full details
- AMD FirePro M4000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P400 Full details
- AMD FirePro W600 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5130M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4100 Full details
- AMD FirePro V5900 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2100M Full details
- AMD FirePro V5800 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8700 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V5800 Full details
- AMD Firepro W4190M Full details
- AMD FirePro M4170 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA Quadro 6000
VCQ6000-PB
VCQ6000-PB
VCQ6000-PB
VCQ6000-PB
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 new from 344.00 $. 2 used from 248.00 $. Last updated 13 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 344.04 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Core2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3GHz Dual-Core (EU80570PJ0806M) Processor Only 2 new from 23.00 $. 23 used from 9.00 $. Last updated 6 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 23.03 $ |
Yes
|
|
Intel E8400 Core 2 Duo Processor 3 GHz 6 MB Cache Socket LGA775 2 new from 186.00 $. 6 used from 19.00 $. Last updated 26 minutes ago. |
|
Yes | 186.60 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.