Call of Duty: WWII bottleneck calculator
AMD Phenom II X4 840 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Call of Duty: WWII
1024 × 768
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Call of Duty: WWII
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
AMD Phenom II X4 840
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1024 × 768 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
In a system configuration featuring the AMD Phenom II X4 840 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE could potentially act as a bottleneck to the AMD Phenom II X4 840 performance in the Call of Duty: WWII with 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor. While the AMD Phenom II X4 840 is well-equipped to manage strenuous computational tasks, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE limited graphical prowess may compromise the overall system efficiency. This disparity could lead to decreased performance and less effective utilization of system resources. To rectify this imbalance, an upgrade to a more capable graphics card that complements the AMD Phenom II X4 840 processing abilities is advisable.
With a screen resolution of 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, this configuration demonstrates a 3.7% graphics card bottleneck when performing Call of Duty: WWII.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the AMD Phenom II X4 840 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE, under the context of Call of Duty: WWII with a screen resolution of 1024 × 768 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 72.5%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 83.2%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
During gameplay scenarios, your AMD Phenom II X4 840 might not operate at its full potential due to the constraints imposed by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE. In such cases, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE may struggle to swiftly process and relay data, resulting in underutilization of the AMD Phenom II X4 840. Therefore, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE will be operating at its maximum capacity, leaving the AMD Phenom II X4 840 capabilities untapped.
In the hierarchy of bottlenecks, a graphics card bottleneck is often considered less severe than a processor bottleneck. When a graphics card bottleneck occurs, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE operates at its uppermost limits, thereby allowing you to extract the best performance possible from the card. This ensures that you benefit from the full scope of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE features.
One distinct advantage of not maxing out the AMD Phenom II X4 840 is the enhanced ability to efficiently manage other background tasks. As the AMD Phenom II X4 840 is not operating at full capacity while gaming, it can allocate computational resources to other ongoing activities like background processes or multitasking, without any performance trade-offs. This contributes to a smoother and more flexible overall system operation.
To gain a deeper understanding of these potential bottlenecks, consider referring to our heatmap. On the heatmap, the X-axis depicts the CPU Score, and the Y-axis signifies the GPU Score. This visualization can help identify the relationship between various CPUs and GPUs, giving you valuable insights into how to better balance your system.
By matching your AMD Phenom II X4 840 CPU Score with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE GPU Score on the heatmap, you can more accurately assess how these components interact and pinpoint where bottlenecks may occur. Utilizing this heatmap analysis can guide you in making informed hardware decisions that lead to a more balanced and effective computing setup tailored to your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 10.7%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 67.12%
- Processor maximum
- 80.82%
- Graphic card average
- 83.05%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 0%
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 83.1%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 82.26%
- Graphic card maximum
- 98.99%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 28.6%
- Bottleneck reason
- Graphic card
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 53.7%
- Processor maximum
- 64.65%
- Graphic card average
- 83.05%
- Graphic card maximum
- 100%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
If your graphic card is causing the bottleneck but you're considering replacing your processor, reconsider this approach. Unless your processor is already on the verge of becoming outdated, upgrading it might not offer a significant performance boost, particularly in graphics-heavy tasks.
- AMD Phenom II X4 830 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3258 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2125 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 820 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3260 Full details
- Intel Pentium G2140 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B25 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3430 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 910e Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 630 Full details
- Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 631 Full details
- Intel Celeron G5905T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B93 Full details
- Intel Celeron G3900 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3450 Full details
- AMD A6-3670 Full details
- AMD A8-3820 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3455E Full details
- Intel Pentium G3440 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 973 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 920 Full details
- Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 Full details
- Intel Core i3-3210 Full details
- Intel Core i3-3225 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 635 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3460 Full details
- Intel Celeron G3930 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X4 640 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 B40 Full details
- Intel Celeron G4900T Full details
- Intel Core i5-650 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3455 Full details
- AMD A6-7480 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2105 Full details
- Intel Pentium G3260T Full details
- AMD Phenom 9750 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3330 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5420 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5462 Full details
- Intel Xeon X5472 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3353 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5430 Full details
- Intel Xeon E3-1220L V2 Full details
- Intel Xeon L5430 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3323 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the resolution in this scenario will only make the bottleneck worse, as the GPU will be under even more stress, leading to lower frame rates and reduced graphical quality. It won't significantly ease the load on the already underutilized processor.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
When the graphic card becomes a system bottleneck, upgrading it can provide a significant boost in performance. Opt for a card that better matches the capabilities of your processor to get a more balanced system. This will also enable you to run games and applications at higher settings, offering a vastly improved user experience.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6970 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 8950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 550X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5970 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7770 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5870 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6870 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 350 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5850 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6850 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 640 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 450 Full details
- AMD FirePro W4300 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K280Q Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 6000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000 Full details
- AMD FirePro V9800 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K2 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4100M Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V8800 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K620 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K3100M Full details
- AMD FirePro V7900 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Full details
- AMD FirePro M5100 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 5000 Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
If your graphics card is bottlenecking the system, lowering the screen resolution will allow the card to handle data more efficiently, resulting in higher frames per second. However, it's worth noting that lower resolutions will require less data processing from the CPU, which could create a new bottleneck there.
Read moreOffers for AMD Phenom II X4 840
Phenom II X4 840
Phenom II X4 840
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes | 24.95 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 840 3.2 GHz 2 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor HDX840WFK42GM Socket AM3 1 new from 54.00 $. 2 used from 24.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 54.04 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.