Just Cause 4 bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron 420 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Popular combinations
Popular graphic card comparisons
Popular processor comparisons
Just Cause 4
1920 × 1200
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
Just Cause 4
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron 420
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1920 × 1200 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Celeron 420 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 in the Just Cause 4 with 1920 × 1200 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Celeron 420 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
In a configuration featuring the Intel Celeron 420 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, with a screen resolution of 1920 × 1200 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 19.7% bottleneck for Just Cause 4.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron 420 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950, under the context of Just Cause 4 with a screen resolution of 1920 × 1200 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 82.8%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 60.4%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Celeron 420 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Celeron 420 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Celeron 420 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
By correlating your Intel Celeron 420 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 68.2%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 81.88%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 23.94%
- Graphic card maximum
- 29.24%
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 74.5%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 81.88%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 19.16%
- Graphic card maximum
- 23.4%
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
- Bottleneck percentage
- 60.2%
- Bottleneck reason
- Processor
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
Utilizations
- Processor average
- 81.88%
- Processor maximum
- 100%
- Graphic card average
- 29.93%
- Graphic card maximum
- 36.56%
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 Full details
- AMD E2-3200 Full details
- Intel Pentium E5400 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 215 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8135 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7750 Full details
- Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6700 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7200 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 240e Full details
- Intel Core i3-3229Y Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6750 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E7400 Full details
- Intel Pentium E6300 Full details
- Intel Pentium E5500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 240 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 220 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B22 Full details
- AMD A4-3420 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7850 Full details
- Intel Atom E3845 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 235e Full details
- AMD Phenom X3 8550 Full details
- AMD A4-3400 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8250e Full details
- Intel Pentium E5700 Full details
- Intel Pentium G630T Full details
- AMD Athlon 5200B Full details
- Intel Celeron E3200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Full details
- AMD Athlon 5050e Full details
- Intel Pentium E2220 Full details
- Intel Celeron E3400 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5000B Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E4600 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5200 Full details
- AMD Athlon 5000 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E6550 Full details
- Intel Pentium G620T Full details
- Intel Pentium E5300 Full details
- AMD Athlon 7550 Full details
- Intel Xeon 5160 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3060 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3070 Full details
- Intel Xeon 5140 Full details
- Intel Xeon 3065 Full details
- Intel Xeon Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon Eng Sample: 100-000000560-40_Y Full details
- AMD Radeon Sky 500 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7950 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270X Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7870 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 270 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 370 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 460 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7850 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560 Full details
- AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Full details
- AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Full details
- AMD Radeon RX 560X Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260X Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7790 Full details
- AMD Radeon R9 360 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6990 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 260 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K4200 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7000 Adapter Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro M2000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Full details
- AMD FirePro W8000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K2200 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P620 Full details
- NVIDIA GRID K520 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro P600 Full details
- AMD FirePro W7170M Full details
- NVIDIA Tesla C2070 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K5100M Full details
- AMD FirePro W5100 Full details
- AMD FirePro W5000 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1200 Full details
- AMD FirePro M6100 FireGL V Full details
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
02G-P4-1954-KR
GTX 950 2GD5T OCV2
SC GAMING
GTX 950 2GD5T OC
STRIX-GTX950-DC2OC-2GD5-GAMING
STRIX-GTX950-DC2OC-2GD5-GAMING
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes | 138.00 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
|
Yes | 184.95 $ |
Yes
|
|
|
3 new from 219.00 $. 1 used from 221.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 259.90 $ |
Yes
|
|
18 new from 279.00 $. 1 used from 277.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 279.99 $ |
Yes
|
|
MSI GTX 950 Gaming 2G Graphics Cards GTX 950 Gaming 2G 1 new from 299.00 $. 1 used from 314.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
|
Yes | 299.00 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Offers for Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
Celeron 420
| Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Yes | 69.95 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.