Forza Horizon 3 bottleneck calculator
Intel Celeron E3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Forza Horizon 3
1600 × 900
1 monitor
1. Select game
Currently selected:
![Forza Horizon 3 image](http://images.igdb.com/igdb/image/upload/t_cover_big/co2e25.jpg)
Forza Horizon 3
2. Select processor
Currently selected:
Intel Celeron E3400
3. Select graphic card
Currently selected:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
4. Select resolution
Currently selected:
1600 × 900 resolution
(1 monitor)
Calculation result
Bottleneck percentage
The Intel Celeron E3400 may serve as a bottleneck for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 in the Forza Horizon 3 with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor. Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 is engineered to manage heavy graphical tasks, the Intel Celeron E3400 might lack the processing power needed to fully unlock the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 capabilities. This imbalance may inhibit the overall efficiency of your system, slowing down processing and possibly compromising graphical fidelity. For a more harmonious hardware setup, upgrading to a high-performing processor that can meet the demands of current software and games is advised.
![Gauge that shows 22% of bottleneck](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/gauge/bottleneck-gauge-22-percent.png)
In a configuration featuring the Intel Celeron E3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280, with a screen resolution of 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor, the system experiences a 22.2% bottleneck for Forza Horizon 3.
Processor and graphic card utilizations
In a computing setup featuring the Intel Celeron E3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280, under the context of Forza Horizon 3 with a screen resolution of 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor, the processor is expected to have an utilization rate of 79.4%, while the graphics card is projected to be utilized at 58.5%.
It's crucial to understand that these figures signify theoretical maximums based on typical CPU-to-GPU workload distribution ratios for certain tasks or gaming experiences. Achieving these high levels of utilization in real-world settings can be a challenging endeavor.
![Utilization chart of Intel Celeron E3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 inForza Horizon 3 with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/bar/utilizations-game_2P-forza-horizon-3_1600x900_0aW-intel-celeron-e3400_014-nvidia-geforce-gtx-280.png)
Playability
- Playable
- Frames per second
-
A game is considered "playable" if it can consistently run at 60 FPS on high settings. This ensures a smooth and visually appealing gaming experience free from lags or stutters.
Heatmap of bottleneck
In gaming scenarios, your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 might not attain its full performance potential due to a lack of optimal utilization. This happens when the Intel Celeron E3400 fails to handle and transmit data to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 at an adequate speed. As a result, the Intel Celeron E3400 will be operating at its maximum capacity, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 remains underutilized.
When it comes to bottlenecks, a processor bottleneck is generally viewed as more detrimental than a graphics card bottleneck. In cases of a processor bottleneck, the Intel Celeron E3400 capacity reaches its limits, which may adversely affect other applications running concurrently. This situation can result in diminished responsiveness and multi-tasking capabilities.
Moreover, due to the processor bottleneck, the system might not leverage the full performance capabilities of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280. Consequently, there could be restrictions in graphical rendering, frame rates, and the overall gaming experience.
To visualize these bottlenecks, consider examining our heatmap. On this heatmap, the X-axis represents the CPU Score, while the Y-axis denotes the GPU Score. A quick glance at this heatmap can offer invaluable insights into potential bottlenecks within various system configurations.
![Bottleneck heatmap chart of crossing Intel Celeron E3400 score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 score inForza Horizon 3 with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/heatmap/game-2P-forza-horizon-3_resolution-1600x900_cpuScore-27259_gpuScore-18340.png)
By correlating your Intel Celeron E3400 CPU Score and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 GPU Score on the heatmap, you can acquire a more comprehensive understanding of how these components interact and where the bottlenecks might occur. Making well-informed hardware choices based on this heatmap analysis can lead to a more balanced and efficient computing setup for your specific needs.
General bottleneck calculations
The bottleneck calculations presented here are geared specifically towards in-game scenarios, providing valuable insights into how your hardware configuration could impact gaming performance. However, it's crucial to understand that bottlenecks can manifest in various types of tasks and applications. Below, you will find bottleneck calculations segmented into three primary categories: General Tasks, CPU Intensive Tasks, and GPU Intensive Tasks. This segmentation allows for a more nuanced understanding of how your system's components interact under different types of workloads.
General tasks bottleneck result
For general tasks that include web browsing, video streaming, office applications, and basic multitasking, the bottleneck result offers a comprehensive look at how well your CPU and GPU are balanced. If the bottleneck percentage leans heavily towards either the CPU or GPU, it might be beneficial to consider an upgrade for the more taxed component to ensure smoother system performance.
CPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
When it comes to CPU intensive tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the bottleneck calculation primarily focuses on whether your processor is powerful enough to handle these workloads efficiently. Here, a high bottleneck percentage for the CPU would indicate that your processor is the limiting factor, making tasks slower than they could be with a more robust CPU.
GPU intensive tasks bottleneck result
In scenarios involving GPU intensive tasks—like advanced gaming, graphical rendering, or video processing—the bottleneck calculation highlights the efficiency of your graphics card in relation to the overall system. A high bottleneck percentage on the GPU side would suggest that your graphics card is the limiting component, potentially hindering your system's ability to deliver optimal graphical performance.
Bottleneck solutions
Replace processor
When the processor becomes the system's bottleneck, upgrading it is often the most straightforward way to improve performance. Opting for a faster processor with more cores and higher clock speeds can effectively minimize or even eliminate the bottleneck, making it easier for your graphics card to perform to its maximum capability.
- Intel Pentium G2020T Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 B59 Full details
- Intel Pentium G6960 Full details
- Intel Pentium G850 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 415e Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 565 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8750 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X3 700e Full details
- AMD A6-5400B Full details
- Intel Pentium G860 Full details
- Intel Pentium J3710 Full details
- Intel Core i3-4020Y Full details
- AMD Phenom 8600B Full details
- Intel Celeron J4025 Full details
- Intel Core i5-4300Y Full details
- AMD A4 PRO-7300B Full details
- Intel Core i3-2100T Full details
- Intel Core i3-530 Full details
- AMD A6-6400K Full details
- AMD Phenom II X4 900e Full details
- Intel Core i5-4202Y Full details
- Intel Core i5-4302Y Full details
- Intel Celeron G1610 Full details
- Intel Core i3-2120T Full details
- AMD Phenom 9750B Full details
- Intel Pentium G870 Full details
- AMD A4-7300 Full details
- AMD A4-6320 Full details
- Intel Pentium G840 Full details
- Intel Pentium J2900 Full details
- AMD Phenom 8650 Full details
- Intel Celeron G550 Full details
- Intel Core2 Duo E8500 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 265 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 511 Full details
- Intel Celeron J3160 Full details
- AMD A4-4020 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 B28 Full details
- AMD A6-5400K Full details
- AMD Phenom 9100e Full details
- AMD Athlon II X2 270 Full details
- AMD Phenom II X2 555 Full details
- AMD Athlon X2 340 Full details
- AMD Athlon II X3 400e Full details
- Intel Celeron G1610T Full details
- AMD Opteron 1354 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5320 Full details
- AMD Opteron X3216 Full details
- Intel Xeon E5504 Full details
- Intel Xeon X3210 Full details
![Curve chart that shows processors that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Celeron E3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 inForza Horizon 3 with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-game_2P-forza-horizon-3_1600x900_0aW-intel-celeron-e3400_014-nvidia-geforce-gtx-280_processor.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Interestingly, if you're facing a processor bottleneck, altering the screen resolution may have a counterintuitive impact. Elevating the screen resolution will primarily stress the graphics card, thereby reducing the proportion of work that the processor needs to do in certain tasks. This makes it less likely that the processor will max out, though it does not replace the benefits of a processor upgrade for a balanced system.
Read moreReplace graphic cards
If the processor is causing the bottleneck, replacing the graphic card isn't generally recommended unless you're also planning to upgrade the processor. Downgrading your graphics card to better match the processor might alleviate the bottleneck, but it often results in a decrease in overall system performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks like gaming or 3D rendering.
- AMD Radeon E6760 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A12-9800 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 7670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 PRO-7850B Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 Full details
- AMD Radeon Athlon Gold 3150U Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M270 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8750B Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4810 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M365X Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7700K Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7600 Full details
- AMD Radeon 535DX Full details
- AMD Radeon R8 M445DX Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 M435 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 5670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 Extreme Edition Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 M260DX Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7680 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10 PRO-7800B Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 PRO A10-8770E Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-9600 Radeon Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 FX-8800P Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 4830 Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 6670 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8-7670K Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A6-9500 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-7890K Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A10-8750 Full details
- AMD Radeon Vega 3 Athlon 300U Full details
- AMD Radeon 520 Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 PRO A8-9600B Full details
- AMD Radeon HD 2900 XT Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 Full details
- AMD Radeon R7 A8 PRO-7600B Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Full details
- AMD Radeon R5 A10-9620P Radeon R5, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C Full details
- AMD Radeon Athlon Silver 3050U Full details
- NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX Full details
- AMD FirePro W2100 Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro 2000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro K1000M Full details
- NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 Full details
- AMD FirePro 3D V4800 Full details
- AMD FirePro M7740 Full details
![Curve chart that shows graphic cards that will fix bottleneck in bottleneck calculation of Intel Celeron E3400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 inForza Horizon 3 with 1600 × 900 and 1 monitor](https://images.pc-builds.com/chart/curve/solutions-chart-game_2P-forza-horizon-3_1600x900_0aW-intel-celeron-e3400_014-nvidia-geforce-gtx-280_graphic-card.png)
Impact of Changing Screen Resolution
Increasing the screen resolution in this case will demand more from your graphics card and can make the processor's bottleneck less noticeable in some scenarios, but again, it won't entirely solve the underlying problem.
Read moreOffers for Intel Celeron E3400
![Celeron E3400](https://images.pc-builds.com/images/components/9c7bd782c8737108dc7e6695c6452ff3/629d9291806c8dbf9e03d5bf56adb4ee/531c5a93878c7f1b6a08aeb1c3288387.png)
![Celeron E3400](https://images.pc-builds.com/images/components/9c7bd782c8737108dc7e6695c6452ff3/12768e1733878e54a4e8285635989250/db4a3516a670071f2fa6fcab81c01996.png)
Product name | Merchant | Available | Price |
Merchant
Available
Price
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron E3400 Processor 2.60 GHz 1 MB Cache Socket LGA775 1 new from 18.00 $. 8 used from 13.00 $. Last updated 1 hours ago. |
![]() |
Yes | 18.99 $ |
Yes
|
Product pricing and availability information was updated as of the date and time listed, but is subject to change. If you choose to purchase a product from a retailer, the price and availability displayed on their website at the time of purchase will apply. We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site. However, this does not impact the products or prices that are displayed or the order in which prices are listed.
Bottleneck calculator types
Select purpose bottleneck calculator
Before selecting a bottleneck calculator, consider your primary computing tasks. For general activities like web browsing and office work, the calculator evaluates the balance between your CPU and GPU. If you focus on CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the tool will highlight processor performance. For GPU-centric tasks such as gaming or graphical rendering, it will assess the efficiency of your graphics card. Choose the appropriate calculator to accurately identify potential system bottlenecks for your specific use-case.
Select game bottleneck calculator
By selecting a game from the list, the calculator will analyze potential bottlenecks specifically tailored to that game's system requirements and graphical demands. This allows you to optimize your setup for a smoother, more responsive gaming experience. Choose the game that aligns with your interests to get the relevant bottleneck analysis.